Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. Worksoft Certify

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Worksoft Certify is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 30 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.0, while Worksoft Certify is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Offers the possibility for continuous testing using the server-side (nightly) batch runs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Worksoft Certify writes "Our automation tests are more robust than our manual tests". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SoapUI Pro, SonarQube and Postman, whereas Worksoft Certify is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, UFT (QTP) and Selenium HQ. See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Worksoft Certify report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft SOAtest Logo
7,279 views|3,333 comparisons
Worksoft Certify Logo
11,174 views|3,264 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
383,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic.Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios.

Read more »

With autotesting, we have been able to eliminate duplication of test cases across those four areas. This has helped us knock down our number of test cases. Our test cases are also running more optimally. Therefore, it has very much helped in that sense, so we were able to eliminate a lot of test cases and get out of manual silos by running on autotesting, which is more efficient.It is a pretty easy tool to use as far as automated testing tools go.We are now trying to automate all our applications: SAP, web, third-party, and legacy. Instead of multiple tools, we have been able to have Worksoft handle a lot of our applications. This has saved us a lot of time and effort.People who don't have coding knowledge are capable of doing automation with Certify. It reduces coding and scripting dependencies.Our business users are doing regression testing as their day job. This is an add-on to their daily work. With everything so pressured in the industry, automation takes the pressure of these users.It helps us to implement automation testing as part of most projects, so the need for manual testing can be reduced. This really accelerates the testing process as a whole. Before, where it could take ten days to test a project, now it takes only one or two days to do the complete testing.Worksoft has helped us position our company better because the product lets us show our value in terms of the benefits that we bring.Mostly in the area of project testing, the most immediate benefit is when you historically have manual testers do a certain job, and a full regression testing was previously done 100 percent manually. We have had cases where the release testing for an entire region would take around 12 weeks. With Worksoft, we are now down to two to three weeks. So, that is one use case where we have had success.

Read more »

Cons
The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.

Read more »

It would be great if our business testers could develop their own automated test cases. With every release you do, you have to go back and touch your old test cases and bring them up to speed, or develop new test cases. In the beginning, that is a challenge because you have to have someone who is certified in the tool to help you develop these test cases.Technical support's first response to us is usually late.Web UI testing was difficult in the beginning, as we had a homegrown product, and we had to do the proper object naming.One feature that could be added to Capture 2.0 is generating a PDF file from your capture, so you can see your screenshots and steps.The updates for SAP Fiori have been great, where previously we saw a lot of issues. A year ago, it used to fail miserably.There have been some previous security concerns with the way that Capture has worked. When you turn it on, you don't know what it's capturing. This has raised some concerns in the past, especially in our European regions.The stability needs help. This is main thing that needs help, and if it's not the stability, then it's Worksoft's ability to respond to issues.The technical support comes on, and says, "Oh, so-and-so link is here, go through that link, and make the modifications." I'm not comfortable in making those changes. I want to schedule a call, share my screen, and have them fix it for me.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
They do have a confusing licensing structure.We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%.The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process.

Read more »

There is a cost involved to doing it, but once you get over the initial cost, then you'll start reaping the benefits and seeing that testing is getting done more quickly and efficiently. We are still early on with it, but the expectation and what we're seeing is that we will start seeing some savings coming out on the back-end once we have this done.The price is in line with everyone else's in the market. They are not cheaper nor more expensive than anyone else who was in our RFP.We no longer need ten people sitting and manually testing something. We can just have one person running the entire regression automation testing suite, and this has saved us dollars.The license cost is quite high. This might not be a consideration for a large company, but it will be for a small company. E.g., Tricentis (their competitor) offers certain exclusive use cases where a company can use it in a certain way, so this is another option that companies consider.Automating our manual processes has saved us 70 to 80 percent in time.We saved $1.3 million using Worksoft Certify in 2017.Cost-wise, compared with other tools, it is a great product.This solution has enabled our clients to automate and save time (approximately 40 to 50 percent).

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
383,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
13th
Views
7,279
Comparisons
3,333
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
643
Avg. Rating
9.0
1st
Views
11,174
Comparisons
3,264
Reviews
30
Average Words per Review
1,249
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAtest
Learn
Parasoft
Worksoft
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.
Offer
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankKraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Manufacturing Company8%
Insurance Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company27%
Financial Services Firm13%
Retailer11%
Manufacturing Company9%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company26%
Energy/Utilities Company16%
Consumer Goods13%
Logistics Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company32%
Manufacturing Company13%
Media Company10%
Pharma/Biotech Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise67%
REVIEWERS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise91%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise1%
Large Enterprise93%
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
383,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email