Compare PingID vs. Symantec Siteminder

PingID is ranked 2nd in Authentication Systems with 4 reviews while Symantec Siteminder is ranked 6th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 3 reviews. PingID is rated 8.6, while Symantec Siteminder is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PingID writes "A very sound product that's stable and offers good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Siteminder writes "The flexibility helped us meet the requirements of our customer". PingID is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, ForgeRock, Auth0, CyberArk PAS and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas Symantec Siteminder is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Oracle Access Manager, Symantec VIP Access Manager, WSO2 Identity Server and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. See our PingID vs. Symantec Siteminder report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PingID Logo
4,683 views|3,576 comparisons
Symantec Siteminder Logo
3,595 views|2,237 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about PingID vs. Symantec Siteminder and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
425,509 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches.The soundness of the solution is its most valuable feature. For example, if you are in our corporate network, you can log on without any traffic interfering.It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower.I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications.

More PingID Pros »

The single sign-on is the solution's most valuable featureThe most valuable feature is the integration with the Active Directory.The most valuable feature is that it meets the requirements of the customer. You have a lot of features in the product. Every product has them, but the question is, are these products going to meet the requirement of the customer?

More Symantec Siteminder Pros »

Cons
The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT.If the solution is going to compete with Microsoft, they need to offer more unique functionality to keep their current user base.They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement.It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution.

More PingID Cons »

We're currently unable to find information about if the solution can do a full implementation with SQL. Some better and more accessible documentation for new users or those curious about the product would be helpful.To add more value to this solution it needs to be more user-friendly.CA has reporting at the moment. With the reporting, every particular segmented product has a reporting engine. I would like to see centralized reporting for all of them together.

More Symantec Siteminder Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big.

More Symantec Siteminder Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
425,509 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
Views
4,683
Comparisons
3,576
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
311
Avg. Rating
8.5
6th
Views
3,595
Comparisons
2,237
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
766
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Ping IdentitySingle Sign-On, SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder
Learn
Ping Identity
Broadcom
Overview
IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Symantec® SiteMinder is designed to secure the modern enterprise through a unified access management platform that applies the appropriate authentication mechanism to positively identify users; provides single sign-on and identity federation for seamless access to any application; enforces granular security policies to stop unauthorized access to sensitive resources; and monitors and manages the entire user session to prevent session hijacking. Finally, Symantec SiteMinder is battle-tested and has been deployed in the largest IT environments in the world.

Offer
Learn more about PingID
Learn more about Symantec Siteminder
Sample Customers
Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, RepsolBritish Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider12%
Retailer6%
Media Company5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm41%
Comms Service Provider8%
Healthcare Company8%
Aerospace/Defense Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company41%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company8%
Retailer6%
Find out what your peers are saying about PingID vs. Symantec Siteminder and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
425,509 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of .

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.