We performed a comparison between Red Hat Polymita Business Suite and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The main factor that separates Red Hat software from Oracle, IBM, Pegasystems, is the ability that it gives you to design the screens outside the software and connect it as another component with the BPM engine."
"The ability to leave comments in the Collaboration Hub is a good and easy way for the employees to give feedback on the processes."
"The drag-and-drop functionality in Signavio is impressive and user-friendly, allowing easy connection to other elements without the need for excessive back-and-forth."
"The most valuable feature is the glossary. It is really nice because all of the information is centralized, and that is a big help to the company."
"Version management is helpful because I like to try different versions and then decide which of them should be the main model."
"The collaboration hub, which helps us in terms of being able to communicate with our customers, brings everybody into the tool and close to the process, allowing them to comment and to implement their own processes."
"The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand because it's visually presented. It becomes easy to explain variants and what needs to change."
"One of the most valuable features is ease of use which has really been a good thing to put into the business. People like tools that they can just pick up and use straight-away."
"Process management/Process governance is what we think Signavio is very good at."
"I think the documentation for the tool, the official documentation, is not as strong as in other tools. You have lot of community. That is good. But sometimes you need - when you are working on a big client or a critical process - to be certain about certain things. So I think that the documentation for the tool, from the company, could be a little stronger."
"It is not easy to learn the product."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager needs better automatic rendering of data."
"I would like to be able to include images in the documentation."
"Two executives cannot work on one modeling process simultaneously."
"It could use a better user interface, one that is more efficient."
"Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."
"The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved."
"The user administration, the user-group administration, and the license models need improvement."
More Red Hat Polymita Business Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is ranked 50th in Business Process Management (BPM) while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is rated 10.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Red Hat Polymita Business Suite writes "Gives you the ability to design the screens outside the software and connect them as a component with the BPM engine". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is most compared with , whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
