Compare RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the automatic provisioning and reconciliation of things like the Active Directory groups and memberships.""The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology.""Our customers have benefited from Omada Identity automating the certification process. Most of our customers were using manual methods for user access certification. With Omada Identity, you can automate almost all of it, which means that certification now becomes on demand. You don't have to wait for two or three months to execute a certification timeframe. Instead, you can do certifications as often as you want.""It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend it. It is user-friendly. It has an interface that is end-user or business-user friendly."

More Omada Identity Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support.""The governance aspect in general is great."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pros »

"Word mining and risk campaigns are the most valuable features of this solution.""Out-of-the-box the product has a lot of opportunity for configuration and sophisticated identity management capability.""I like that it is easy to diagnose. It has a version of a virtual appliance so we can download it, run it, configure it, and it would take about 10 to 15 minutes to configure the cluster or so.""There are many valuable features within the solution. The product is easy to customize. It’s also highly secure.""It's a very useful tool that has improved our client's security, from day one.""Self-registration and self-service password management are valuable features. The role modeling feature is also very useful. It allows you to model your enterprise role."

More Symantec Identity Governance and Administration Pros »

Cons
"The user interface should have a more flexible design, where you can change it to your requirement.""When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version.""The Omada Identity SaaS version doesn't provide all the features Omada Identity on-premise provides.""Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues."

More Omada Identity Cons »

"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved.""the user interface could be slightly improved."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Cons »

"In the next release, there should be provisioning of your certifications.""Although the capabilities are there, the user interface needs to be redesigned and the opportunities for integration should be improved.""They should easier and better integration with other software.""The directory has room for improvement. Also, the dashboards and, in particular, the KPI dashboard that shows the current user’s information needs reworking.""Integration capabilities with other solutions and formats, including JSON, could be improved.""They provide a framework to develop your own connectors. A connector is a piece of software that integrates with the solutions that are not a part of the support matrix. Currently, it is difficult to create these connectors in this solution. Other solutions, such as NetIQ Identity, provide a better way to create your own connector. Currently, there is no cloud version. It should have a cloud version."

More Symantec Identity Governance and Administration Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high.""It is licensed per managed user per year."

More Omada Identity Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There are many more expensive products on the market, so the pricing is good"

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
501,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend… more »
Top Answer: Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is… more »
Top Answer: This solution lacks a closed-loop, which causes issues. If on one day (by a single user) multiple requests as submitted… more »
Top Answer: We use this solution to automate lifecycle governance and for role-based access control administration. Within our… more »
Top Answer: Self-registration and self-service password management are valuable features. The role modeling feature is also very… more »
Top Answer: They provide a framework to develop your own connectors. A connector is a piece of software that integrates with the… more »
Top Answer: We offer solutions to financial and government institutions. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is a part… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Omada Identity Suite
SecurID
CA Identity Suite, Symantec IGA, Layer7 Identity Suite, CA Identity Manager (CA IDM), CA Identity Minder, CA IAM, CA Identity Manager (CA IDM), CA Identity Governance
Learn More
Omada
Video Not Available
Overview

Omada Identity delivers an end-to-end identity and access management solution with essential identity governance functionality for secure, compliant, and efficient administration of all users' access rights across on-premises or cloud-based systems. The solution provides configurable best practice processes that covers all identity and access related scenarios from providing an access risk overview, management of identities lifecycle, to automated enforcement of policies.

RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.

The Symantec Identity Governance and Administration (formerly CA Identity Suite) provides comprehensive identity management and governance capabilities with a simple, intuitive user experience. This user experience can dramatically simplify processes such as user access requests and access certifications, resulting in improved productivity and user satisfaction. In addition, the Symantec Identity Governance and Administration performs risk analysis and certification and enables remediation actions in real-time during the access provisioning steps, thereby improving audit performance and risk posture with preventive policy enforcement.

While providing these business and governance-centric capabilities for business users, the Symantec Identity Governance and Administration also delivers core enterprise-grade identity management and governance capabilities, including broad provisioning support for on-premise and cloud apps, extensibility and flexibility to integrate with other IT systems and consumer-grade scale. This means organizations are not forced to choose between usability and performance. With the Symantec Identity Governance and Administration, they can have both.

Offer
Learn more about Omada Identity
Learn more about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle
Learn more about Symantec Identity Governance and Administration
Sample Customers
Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group
NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center
Acciona, Core Blox, DBS
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm32%
Healthcare Company19%
Insurance Company11%
Hospitality Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government8%
Educational Organization8%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise43%
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise67%
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is ranked 12th in Identity Management (IM) with 2 reviews while Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is ranked 5th in Identity Management (IM) with 6 reviews. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is rated 6.6, while Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle writes "A reliable solution with some technical flaws that need to be addressed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Identity Governance and Administration writes "Offers out-of-the-box connectors that have a lot of opportunities for configuration". RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Oracle Identity Governance, One Identity Manager and Saviynt, whereas Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Oracle Identity Governance, Microsoft Identity Manager, ForgeRock and NetIQ Identity Manager. See our RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.