We performed a comparison between SAP Mobile Secure and VMware Workspace ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."If you need only to load a specific profile and you don't have deep security functionalities, et cetera, Intune is very nice and good."
"We can manage and standardize security across your environment, identify problems, receive alerts, and so on. That's its purpose, and that's also why it's so good."
"Easy to use."
"The biggest thing for us is enforcing logins only from devices that are managed by Intune."
"For the price, the features included with Microsoft are appealing."
"I like the tool's integration with Apple. Anyone who creates an ID in Intune will get an Apple ID."
"The mobile application management, MAM, is the most useful aspect of the solution."
"The features I found most valuable in Intune are its user visibility and troubleshooting options."
"Everything is available to you from your handset."
"No issues with scalability."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the tracking of the devices."
"The most valuable feature of VMware Workspace ONE is the support for multiple devices. Not only iOS, and Android, but all kinds of platforms, including VR device management. Additionally, it has a tunneling feature, which no other solution provides. Other solutions have to integrate with other tools to have this functionality, whereas VMware Workspace ONE has its own application gateway tunnel."
"From a remote management perspective, I like the management and the inventory."
"Cloud-based VMware Workspace ONE is very good. It is easy to deploy and manage. Maintenance is also quite simple."
"You can upgrade and migrate the existing group policies that we use for VMware Workspace ONE for the active directory. We can push the policies and group policies. We can migrate it and manage it from VMware Workspace ONE."
"Among the most important improvements is the ability to set up different groups with different deployment policies."
"It was easy to use."
"I wanted to check if there is any provision at the Intune level to restrict certain things, such as a website, but unfortunately, that feature is available only in Microsoft Defender. Intune has web filtering capabilities, but they are only useful for protection from malicious websites, whereas we would like to be able to restrict a website. For example, YouTube is a clean website. No one would identify it as a malicious website, but if we want to stop the end-users from going to that website, we have to go for another product, such as Microsoft Defender or another third-party proxy solution. It would be great if this capability is included in Intune."
"The UI also needs improvements because it is complex for end-users. We have had feedback from a few users in our organization who found the UI is not feasible for tracking and analyzing all the processes and monitoring all the devices."
"It doesn't economize when you scale up. We have over 14,000 employees, and we have between 7,500 and 8,000 city-owned or personal devices being used to conduct city business. Its price can be improved. It is not a cheap solution."
"The current Intune reporting functionality could benefit from some improvements."
"Microsoft Intune's support for Mac devices is lacking and could be improved."
"There are items that require improvements. One is the controls from iOS."
"It's the granularity: 'Is your firewall on? Is BitLocker on?' It's not amazing granularity. But I've looked into other products, like Duo, and they're all similar."
"We need the capabilities of the Cloud Management Gateway (CMG) to be enhanced through Intune instead of Azure."
"We would like it if SAP could integrate the transactional mode as well so that users can perform transactional jobs by mobile-only."
"The Content Locker cannot inherit permissions for the Windows Public Folder. If they could integrate with Microsoft on this point, it would be the perfect functionality."
"From an improvement perspective, there is a need for discounts to be offered by the solution since it is something that any organization can expect from the product."
"There is no Apple zero-day support for updates."
"One of the things that I want them to improve on, if possible, is the management of Mac devices, MacBook Pro, for example. They do it, but they have scope for improvement, in my opinion. It's not that it's that bad, it just a small need."
"I prefer to work with Jamf Pro because it is more specific to working with the iPad features."
"I would like to see improvements made to both the support, and the pricing."
"They do have a good integration, but there is a long way to go as far as integration is concerned. They need to integrate with the cloud solutions a little bit more. We are looking for Azure integration."
"The SaaS environment is not very responsive at times, so the performance can be improved in that regard."
Earn 20 points
SAP Mobile Secure is ranked 26th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) while VMware Workspace ONE is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 82 reviews. SAP Mobile Secure is rated 9.0, while VMware Workspace ONE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP Mobile Secure writes "Easy to use and set up with easy mobile access to reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Workspace ONE writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and offers single sign-on". SAP Mobile Secure is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas VMware Workspace ONE is most compared with VMware Horizon, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl, ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Citrix Workspace.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
