We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and SAS Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main benefit is that the solution is low maintenance. Moreover, it's the license cost is very low because it's part of the package. The maintenance is standard maintenance. And the updates are regular. So there's a regular update and you can choose whether you want to do those updates or not."
"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced."
"Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework."
"SAP Process Orchestration has all the features that are necessary."
"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."
"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."
"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."
"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."
"SAP needs to improve a lot in terms of the orchestration part so that more adapters can be provided to users, which are areas where the solution has downsides."
"It requires some maintenance."
"It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development."
"The usability is an area where it can be improved upon."
"We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters."
"The solution is not very scalable because it is at the end of its life."
"Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use."
"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."
"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."
"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."
SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews while SAS Access is ranked 42nd in Data Integration with 3 reviews. SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2, while SAS Access is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Access writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible". SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and IBM B2B Integrator, whereas SAS Access is most compared with Delphix, SSIS, Zapier and Toad Data Point. See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. SAS Access report.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.