Compare SAP Process Orchestration vs. SEEBURGER BIS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Process Orchestration vs. SEEBURGER BIS and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced.""The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity.""The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable.""The initial setup is easy.""The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems.""Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework.""The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration.""With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pros »

"It used to take half an hour to move one file from one location to another. Now, it takes 10 minutes.""The solution is flexible when it comes to adding integrations. It is much easier to use than the other tools we have to move the files. Across the board, we can move files in a short amount of time compared to our other existing tools.""The platform has been very consistent and responsive.""The stability is world-class. It is as good as any of the other options out there. They have addressed hiccups quickly, professionally, and with an excellent response.""Mapping Designer provides excellent flexibility.""The product has the ability to handle high volumes of data efficiently.""Having the SEEBURGER consulting team perform the installation alleviates a lot of headaches and ensures a stable system.""We had a requirement for transferring data to Amazon S3 buckets but we did not have a solution in our shop for large data transfers to Amazon S3. We worked with SEEBURGER and created a framework solution and now, using that solution, we can configure the transfer in an hour or two and enable it to go to existing or new S3 buckets."

More SEEBURGER BIS Pros »

Cons
"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved.""In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them.""The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users.""It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development.""The older version of the solution will no longer be supported.""The cloud capability features need improvement.""I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."

More SAP Process Orchestration Cons »

"The initial setup is not the straightforward. It took couple of months for us to set up.""Their traditional model is a vendor flow. We are looking to do a customer-based flow, which which require significant development from SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). We are working with them to do this using their WebEDI. It is a brand new area for them, but it could be an option in the future.""The ability to bind a mapping to an agreement seems a bit clunky. It would be nice to have a better way of navigating to a map name rather than using a drop down list.""The initial set up was done by SEEBURGER consulting. It can be complex due to various factors, such as server settings, database settings, and security settings.""The product is not integrated very well with different cloud providers. We did work with the vendor to build a solution for Amazon, but there is no solution for other cloud providers like Google or Azure. The vendor needs to create adapters so that if we have a requirement to transfer data from our data center to another cloud, outside of Amazon, we would be delighted with that.""I don't think the scalability of the solution is that great because they have tied the solution to their named nodes and it does not allow scalability like some of the cloud products allow.""In some of the other tools out there in the market, you can create one service and use that service without creating a copy. That kind of capability currently doesn't exist in this solution.""When we got SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS), it was clear that it was going to take more of a technical person. It does take a technically-rooted individual to operate it. It's not something for your everyday guy to do. For what it's doing for us, a dedicated resource is required."

More SEEBURGER BIS Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good.""The pricing for this solution is fine.""There are fees in addition to the licensing."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing and licensing is very competitive.""I did a review of other options out there, as we moved into the future and our SAP implementation, that this would be the right solution. It was very comparable to other manage services out there. Thus, there wasn't any clear-cut reason to go in another direction.""The cost of the SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) can be considered high. We have elected to have SEEBURGER consulting do the installation. Licensing could also be considered high. However, one would be hard pressed to find another product that does all that this one does.""It has a very goofy pricing model in the sense that they have so many components and it's not very clear what components you require to do your work. When you ask for that, you learn that there's a surcharge for them. It's not that you buy a product and you can use all the compatibilities. They have all these different bits and pieces of it and you have to pay extra for all those things.""Pricing, compared to the tool that we had earlier, is cheaper.""The way they have their licensing structure set up, they have a lot of different modules. For us, we did not really know if we were licensed for certain things or not. We had to reach out to them multiple times to tell them that we were looking for this or that capability. We had to buy licenses for different things at different points in time, not knowing that we could have it bundled initially.""The pricing is cheap. In fact, when I saw the pricing, I thought, "Really? What's the catch?" But the functionality that we get out of it, for the price we pay, is great value.""I find the pricing expensive. But I know that when we evaluated another company, it was about the same. That just seems to be the market. It's probably not expensive overall."

More SEEBURGER BIS Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems.
Top Answer: SAP has decided to move everything to the cloud, which means that we have to invest more. New investments would include things like redevelopment and data transfer. In general, we are not satisfied… more »
Top Answer: If SEEBURGER plans to do something, they will meet their target. We haven't been disappointed by them at all. For example, we had six trading partners to onboard and they said, "We'll make it happen,"… more »
Top Answer: The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if… more »
Top Answer: For the area that we've used them for so far, I don't really see any way that they can make it easier. I can't say enough about how they have delivered exactly what they said that they would, and for… more »
Ranking
Views
5,081
Comparisons
4,184
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
749
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
6,650
Comparisons
2,017
Reviews
20
Average Words per Review
1,644
Avg. Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Also Known As
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process IntegrationSeeburger Business Integration Suite
Learn
SAP
Seeburger
Overview
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a central platform for all integration activities. It enables you to respond easily, rapidly and innovatively to your digital transformation challenges:

  • B2B integration: Network and integrate your company with any or all of your business partners.

  • API integration and API management: Establish a framework for networking all of your systems across companies in real-time.

  • Managed File Transfer (MFT) integration: Use secure and simple mechanisms for standardized intra- and cross-company data exchange processes and data integration.

Offer
Learn more about SAP Process Orchestration
Learn more about SEEBURGER BIS
Sample Customers
Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser KompressorenAltis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company29%
Recreational Facilities And Services Company14%
Mining And Metals Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Comms Service Provider9%
Media Company6%
Retailer5%
REVIEWERS
Retailer23%
Transportation Company23%
Manufacturing Company14%
Pharma/Biotech Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider8%
Non Profit7%
Retailer6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Large Enterprise70%
REVIEWERS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise79%
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Process Orchestration vs. SEEBURGER BIS and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 3rd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 7 reviews while SEEBURGER BIS is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 19 reviews. SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.0, while SEEBURGER BIS is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "Gateway for all integrations that is stable and quick to install". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SEEBURGER BIS writes "Enables any-to-any transformation from one data format to another". SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, webMethods Integration Server, Boomi AtomSphere Integration, SAP Data Services and SnapLogic, whereas SEEBURGER BIS is most compared with IBM B2B Integrator, Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, OpenText Trading Grid and Mule Anypoint Platform. See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. SEEBURGER BIS report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.