We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Selenium HQ vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Selenium HQ Logo
13,669 views|11,946 comparisons
Tricentis NeoLoad Logo
6,328 views|3,720 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features of Selenium HQ are it is open-source, has a good interface, and integrates well.""The most valuable feature is the Selenium grid, which allows us to run tests in parallel.""I like its simplicity.""What I like the most about this product is that it gives us a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do.""For me, the most valuable feature of Selenium lies in its ability to help us find elements quickly. Apart from that, the driver interface is really useful, too. When we implement the Selenium driver interface, we can easily navigate through all of the pages and sections of an app, including performing things like clicking, putting through SendKeys, scrolling down, tagging, and all the other actions we need to test for in an application.""Ability to integrate with every other tool.""Data parametrization and parallelization are the most important features in any automation tool.""Its biggest advantage is that it is very customizable."

More Selenium HQ Pros »

"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good.""The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.""The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.""The stability is okay.""The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pros »

Cons
"It is not a licensed tool. The problem with that is that it won't be able to support Windows desktop applications. There is no support for Windows desktop applications. They can do something about it. Its user interface can also be improved, which is not great compared to the other latest tools. Anybody who has been working on functional testing or manual testing cannot directly work on Selenium HQ without learning programming skills, which is a disadvantage.""One drawback to Selenium is that there is nothing like an object repository, such as that found in QTP, especially considering continuous integration practices that have become common nowadays.""The login could be improved, to obviate the need for relying on another one for integration with Selenium HQ""There should be standardized frameworks to build automation.""The latest versions are often unstable.""Selenium HQ could have better interaction with SAP products.""It would be very helpful to be able to write scripts in a GUI, rather than depend so heavily on the command line.""Selenium uses a layer-based approach that is somewhat slower than Eggplant when it comes to executing code."

More Selenium HQ Cons »

"LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all.""Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.""LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more protocols.""Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.""Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue.""I would like to see support for auto-correlations."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This is an open-source product so there is no cost other than manpower.""Selenium is free software so we do not pay licensing costs.""We are satisfied with the pricing.""Selenium HQ is open source and our use of it in our company is provided for free.""It's an open-source tool that you can work with at any time without any cost.""Selenium is a free tool.""Selenium is open-source.""It is all free."

More Selenium HQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based.""Its licensing cost is very less."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is very easy to implement.
Top Answer: The solution is open-source and free to use. There are no licensing costs.
Top Answer: In the past, we had difficulty with screenshots, but this has been remedied. We feel that all the current solutions are usable and the providers are helpful. This said, the login could be improved, to… more »
Top Answer: I'm not exactly sure what the pricing is as it differs from client to client. That said, LoadRunner is expensive and NeoLoad is less expensive whereas JMeter is free.
Top Answer: There are still some glitches that they need to improve. We have given support feedback as well when we have some issues. They're very responsive and they do work to fix and improve issues. LoadRunner… more »
Ranking
3rd
Views
13,669
Comparisons
11,946
Reviews
26
Average Words per Review
537
Rating
7.5
Views
6,328
Comparisons
3,720
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
500
Rating
8.2
Comparisons
Also Known As
SeleniumHQ
NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
Learn More
SeleniumHQ
Video Not Available
Overview

Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:

  1. Selenium WebDriver - create robust, browser-based regression automation suites & tests and scale & distribute scripts across many environments.
  2. Selenium IDE - create quick bug reproduction scripts and create scripts to aid in automation-aided exploratory testing.

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Offer
Learn more about Selenium HQ
Learn more about Tricentis NeoLoad
Sample Customers
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Computer Software Company22%
Retailer13%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company6%
REVIEWERS
Retailer18%
Computer Software Company18%
Government18%
Individual & Family Service12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise43%
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise76%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Selenium HQ is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 24 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 6th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Selenium HQ is rated 7.6, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Highly customizable and the best tool out there to do automated testing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Worksoft Certify, Tricentis Tosca, Appium and Micro Focus UFT One, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Flood and BlazeMeter.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.