We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Central and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools."The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."
"The initial setup is easy. It's easy to configure."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work."
"User-friendly ID and direct integration with GitHub are the most valuable."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."
"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."
"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"The performance could be faster."
"The product must provide more automation."
"Visual Studio Test Professional should include more automation."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
OpenText Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 46 reviews. OpenText Silk Central is rated 7.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText Silk Central is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
