Compare SmartBear TestComplete vs. UFT (QTP)

SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 6 reviews while UFT (QTP) is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 6 reviews. SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.6, while UFT (QTP) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Good regressions tool, SoapUI tools, and cross-browser capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Ranorex Studio, UFT (QTP) and Katalon Studio, whereas UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and UFT Pro (LeanFT). See our SmartBear TestComplete vs. UFT (QTP) report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SmartBear TestComplete Logo
19,747 views|12,945 comparisons
UFT (QTP) Logo
25,596 views|15,788 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear TestComplete vs. UFT (QTP) and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
383,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution is great as a record and playback tool. It also has valuable regression testing.The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers.The most valuable feature of this solution is regression testing tools.The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps.The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution.

Read more »

We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.​Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users.Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test.With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources.

Read more »

Cons
The solution needs more training manuals or some form of online forum for learning. It needs more documentation.The solution needs Mac OS support. Right now, the solution has only been developed to accommodate Windows OS.The artificial intelligence needs to be improved.What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing.Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage.

Read more »

Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation).I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications.Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team.The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
383,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
19,747
Comparisons
12,945
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
384
Avg. Rating
8.6
3rd
Views
25,596
Comparisons
15,788
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
968
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
SmartBear
Micro Focus
Overview

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Offer
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Learn more about UFT (QTP)
Sample Customers
Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters. CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company18%
Retailer12%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company30%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company10%
Insurance Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Retailer14%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise49%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise32%
Large Enterprise55%
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise85%
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear TestComplete vs. UFT (QTP) and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
383,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email