Compare SmartBear TestComplete vs. Wikidi Testomato

SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 9 reviews while Wikidi Testomato is ranked 43rd in Functional Testing Tools. SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.0, while Wikidi Testomato is rated 0. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Easy set up and test creation but the test object repository needs improvement". On the other hand, SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Ranorex Studio, Katalon Studio, Micro Focus UFT One, Tricentis Tosca and Eggplant Functional, whereas Wikidi Testomato is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Wikidi Testomato? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The option we chose was around $2,000 USD.The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.

More SmartBear TestComplete Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
19,559
Comparisons
13,010
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
417
Avg. Rating
8.0
43rd
Views
38
Comparisons
18
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Testomato
Learn
SmartBear
Wikidi
Video Not Available
Overview

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Wikidi Testomato monitors your website for problems that make your business vulnerable. It has Easy-to-read reports that tracks site performance to identify error patterns and prevent future issues, Instant Alerts that runs website checks every 5 minutes and monitors uptime performance every 15 seconds reducing time-to-resolution and Quick Setup that starts running checks in seconds to verify your website is working.
Offer
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Learn more about Wikidi Testomato
Sample Customers
Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.Jollibee, Wingmen Online Marketing GmbH, Kaymu, Dixi, Toi Toi
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider8%
Media Company6%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.