Compare Zarafa vs. Zimbra Collaboration

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Zarafa Logo
374 views|310 comparisons
Zimbra Collaboration Logo
6,190 views|5,141 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Zimbra and others in Email Applications. Updated: June 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Zimbra Collaboration is less expensive than Microsoft Exchange. Zimbra works for small companies because it is not expensive. Zimbra Collaboration has more security tools than Microsoft Exchange. If you are choosing between Zimbra Collaboration and Microsoft Exchange, you have to take into account the cost of security tools with Microsoft Exchange. When you purchase Microsoft Exchange, you will also have to purchase tools for security, which adds to the cost. The migration from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution is very simple and easy. Migration from Microsoft Exchange to another email solution is very difficult. Microsoft doesn't allow migration that easily. In fact, you have to pay for tools to do that. You have to buy some expensive tools to migrate.""If you choose the network edition, it is a little pricier. They have the open-source edition too which is only community supported."

More Zimbra Collaboration Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The stability is good and keeps getting better with each new update.
Top Answer: The solution is very low cost. It's an open-source solution. It's not an expensive option.
Top Answer: We are simply a customer and an end-user. We don't have a business relationship with the organization. The log files need to be improved. It needs to show us more information. Right now, a lot of… more »
Ranking
13th
out of 18 in Email Applications
Views
374
Comparisons
310
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
3rd
out of 18 in Email Applications
Views
6,190
Comparisons
5,141
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
492
Rating
7.5
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
Open-source email and collaboration software with calendaring, tasks and contacts management, mobile devices compatability.
Zimbra Collaboration provides administrators and their end users innovative features that solve the challenges faced by organizations using today's legacy communications infrastructure.
Offer
Learn more about Zarafa
Learn more about Zimbra Collaboration
Sample Customers
Tivoli, InterAkt Contour, Riagg Rijnmond, Lammerink, Revell, KMP, International School of the Hague
NEC Biglobe, City of Ventura, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Hola Publishing, BIG, Sleepwell, LaFayette College, Xmission, DNA, Ring Line, Future Group, TIGC
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider45%
Computer Software Company17%
Educational Organization6%
Media Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business60%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise20%
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Zimbra and others in Email Applications. Updated: June 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Zarafa is ranked 13th in Email Applications while Zimbra Collaboration is ranked 3rd in Email Applications with 4 reviews. Zarafa is rated 0.0, while Zimbra Collaboration is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zimbra Collaboration writes "It is light to manage and low-cost, but lacks storage management". Zarafa is most compared with Open-Xchange, whereas Zimbra Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, Open-Xchange, IceWarp, Kerio Connect and ProtonMail.

See our list of best Email Applications vendors.

We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.