The primary use case of this solution is for storage and document sharing.
For example, if I have a customer and they want to share a document, I can access it through Google.
The primary use case of this solution is for storage and document sharing.
For example, if I have a customer and they want to share a document, I can access it through Google.
Ubiquiti is what is most valuable. They have basically mimicked Microsoft, giving you the equivalent of Office 365 type of services that are available.
It's robust, and it has a wide reach in terms of office applications including storage.
It's easy to access in a public cloud environment.
Every once in a while I have trouble accessing it, but I don't know if that's a function of the Cloud, the way the Cloud is set up, or it's just something on my browser.
Stability could be improved in terms of the Cloud in general administration. It's frustrating when companies have to deal with Cloud Administration.
Change configuration management is an issue. I can envision customer companies that are Cloud-enabled where their biggest problem is having to keep up with the changes and managing it.
The API is constantly evolving. IP addresses are constantly changing and it's hard to keep up with all of those changes.
Typically it is being administered through IT organizations, although they have no visibility.
If you engage in a security solution through a cloud provider, you have no view, it's all faith, trust, and hope.
How do you reconcile the two, to provide the visibility, do it seamlessly, and make it easy to use?
If they could include a popup section where all of the new updates are. That would be helpful. I don't have the experience or intelligence to know what it is that they are showing, or where I can get that I might need, which would make a feature like this important.
It would like it if upon starting the browser, it tells you that it is out of date and asks if you would like to update. That would lead customers to take the optimal path as opposed to having to figure it out themselves.
There are issues with stability. There may be capacity issues at the time but it's hard to guess what the root cause is. There is no visibility. You don't have the visibility unless you really know upfront what your problem is. Otherwise, you are left hanging.
It's scalable, but I don't plan to increase my usage. Personally, I avoid a public cloud offering system from a security perspective unless it's something a customer requires to access documents.
Prior to the public cloud, I used another solution more like a public hosting-type of service. It didn't give you the scale and the means of payment that you have with the Cloud. As an example, look at Lotus Notes, 1980 technology. There is no comparison, Google is far superior. People see the ease, simplicity, and again the Ubiquiti of the service attached to it.
The initial setup is simple. You go in there and you register. It starts with your email address and then you are done.
We provide private networks, what we call VPNs. It is the older, traditional VPN type service for our customers, which gives them security and performance metrics that you can't get from the internet.
We have a gen engine that has that interface into the cloud providers including Google.
We don't by services from Google, we are not even doing infrastructures, or platform as a service or software as a service.
We are not using this solution in my organization. We have our own internal storage for security reasons, and predominantly, we use it in-house. We call it orange, it's flex storage. It's our intranet.
We either use in-house or have exclusive arrangements with companies.
The concept of the cloud is great, you have the scale, you have the financial model, metered pay as you go, those are great, but what's worse is that it's a black box.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
We use the solution for our SAP infrastructure.
The product’s infrastructure is up to the mark. The infrastructure is easy to manage. It is better than Azure and AWS. It is easy to implement the product.
DevOps must be improved. DevOps in AWS is quite easy to establish and can be easily used by startups and big companies. It is not so with Google Cloud. The product must provide AI features.
I have been using the solution for more than one and a half years.
The tool is quite stable.
The tool is scalable. We support our customers. We have around 2000 to 3000 customers.
The support is good. The third-party support could be improved.
Positive
The installation is easy. Most of my customers have Windows. VDI lags in Google Cloud. The deployment takes one month. We have more than 30 people in our technical team. We have eight to ten people to maintain the solution. Other people are involved in support or are senior employees like cloud architects. It is easy to maintain the tool.
The solution is cheaper than AWS. The licenses are annual. The cost is inclusive of support.
We are partners. People must choose Google Cloud. It is a great product. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
I use Google Cloud for services like corporate email, data collection, Google Meet, session recording, presentation, and storing important documents in the cloud.
You can use Google Cloud tools easily, even if you know how Word, Excel, or PowerPoint works. Additionally, Google Meet is simple to use regarding configuration and recording sessions.
They could integrate artificial intelligence into the applications.
We have been using Google Cloud since 2015.
I rate the product's stability a ten out of ten.
I rate the product’s scalability an eight out of ten.
The initial setup process is simple. It takes just five minutes to complete and doesn’t require a much bigger team. You should know the access ID and password to log in.
Anybody can deploy the product.
They provide user-based licensing plans. Its plan could be less expensive.
I rate Google Cloud a nine out of ten. They should work on the cost. It is not feasible for many organizations to pay 1,500 per user.
Our aim is to provide comprehensive solutions to our valued customers. Whether it be to fulfill their specific requests or to help them attain their desired outcomes, we utilize the cutting-edge technology available in Google Cloud. This allows us to effectively cater to our client's needs while also providing a mutually beneficial experience.
My customers appreciate all the features that Google Cloud has to offer. They are looking for solutions for computing engines, storage, web hosting, and various other needs. The most useful feature depends on their specific requirements and how they plan to utilize Google Cloud. Each customer has their own unique set of needs and the Google Cloud provides a range of options to meet those needs.
Google Cloud could improve interoperability with other cloud services.
Our objective was to attain a convenient and straightforward configuration process not only in Google Cloud but in other widely utilized cloud services. Regardless of the cloud service you are currently utilizing or intend to connect to, we desire for the process to be seamless and effortlessly attainable with only quick action. It is our hope that all cloud services possess this level of interoperability with one another.
I have been using Google Cloud for approximately five years.
The stability of Google Cloud is great.
Google Cloud is scalable.
I have not used the support from Google Cloud.
I have used Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS prior to using Google Cloud. I prefer Google Cloud. The interface is designed in a way that is easy to understand, even for those with limited technical knowledge. One can effortlessly acquire the necessary knowledge through online resources, allowing for self-sufficient learning.
The initial setup of the solution was easy. We only need to complete approximately four steps and we have a cloud instance. The process takes 10 seconds.
There is not any specific maintenance required to be done with the solution.
My advice to others is for them to take all the advantages of the free tiers from each cloud solution vendor and then decide what they want to use.
I rate Google Cloud a nine out of ten.
We use Google Cloud mainly for development purposes.
What I like most about Google Cloud is its stability.
I also like that its GUI works fine for my company.
Lower pricing would make Google Cloud better.
We've been using Google Cloud for three to four years.
I found Google Cloud stable. In terms of stability, it's a nine out of ten.
Google Cloud is scalable, and I'm giving it a rating of eight out of ten in terms of scalability.
We have yet to contact Google Cloud technical support because we have not encountered issues with the solution.
We also work with Amazon, apart from Google Cloud. The two solutions are the same, more or less. It's only the usage that's different. We usually recommend both to clients, and whichever clients prefer, we go with that solution.
Google Cloud has a simple setup.
Pricing for Google Cloud could be improved. It would be better if it were lower.
My company uses Google Cloud.
My company has around ten Google Cloud users.
I'm rating Google Cloud as eight out of ten. I deducted two points as the price could be lower.
Google Cloud is a solution my company usually recommends to clients.
I'm a Google Cloud user, and the company I work for has no partnership with Google.
Our primary use case for this solution is the installation of files for tracking and storage purposes.
The availability of content on the solution is very valuable.
The product could be improved by expanding the initial storage space available.
We have been using this solution for approximately five years.
The solution is stable. About 5000 people are using this solution in our company.
We have had a great experience with customer service and support. They provide excellent service.
Positive
We used Microsoft Cloud previously, but Microsoft Cloud automatically closes the operating system and only gives a certain amount of space. Additionally, we use Office, so we don't have Office 365. We automatically have cloud space on Microsoft.
Deployment is very straightforward.
We worked with vendors for deployment, which took approximately ten minutes.
The licensing costs could be made more affordable for individuals because we need more client-based customers.
I rate this solution a ten out of ten. The solution is very good, but it can be improved by increasing the initial storage space.
This solution is used for storing my data. It's for my family's personal I work as an information security officer.
I like that it's there anytime you need it. There is some security there and you can put 2FA on the folders and share with others if need be.
From my point of view, the security features could be improved.
I've been using this solution for many years.
I have a monthly subscription for Google storage.
We use this solution for email and also make use of the Google servers and related services.
The storage available for this solution could be improved, especially compared to a solution like Microsoft which offers 1 TB of storage. Google cloud offers only 30 GB.
I have used this solution for three years.
This is a stable solution.
This is a scalable solution.
The customer service team for this solution is very knowledgeable.
There is very little setup needed for this solution.
This solution is reasonably priced.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.