HAProxy Other Solutions Considered
We did not evaluate any other options before landing on HAProxy.
View full review »We evaluated NGINX prior to using this product.
View full review »HAProxy is something that we manage ourselves, so we cannot directly compare it with Amazon CloudFront. If we only focus on technology, it is the same features. The only reason we switched is because of management costs.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
HAProxy
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about HAProxy. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
NGINX is easier to configure and is well-suited for load balancing against an application server. However, HAProxy is more versatile and can be fine-tuned for various scenarios, particularly in load-balancing multiple application servers. In terms of deployment, HAProxy is easy to integrate into a green-blue deployment approach. It allows for simpler configuration and sending commands to its sockets.
View full review »KS
Kaushlendra Singh
Manager - IT Infrastructure and Network at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The main difference between HAProxy and other solutions on the market is that it is open source. Otherwise, functional-wise, it's the same.
View full review »I had a look at Nginx for the reverse proxy part but I preferred the typology of the writing of HAProxy.
TH
Software5e4d
Software Engineering Lead at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
NTLM/F5 hardware, nginx.
View full review »HA
Haim Ari
DevOps Tech Lead at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Only lately, nginx has introduced an advanced "proxy" product. It is okay, but HAProxy is better in terms of performance and stability.
View full review »JT
reviewer936006
UNIX System Administrator at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
I chose this solution because I have to operate within a Docker container, and this is the only one that I could get to work.
View full review »We looked at NGINX and Squid.
View full review »We are mainly using HAProxy Community Edition on our own servers. We also use this solution depending on our needs, but maintenance and upgrades are more complicated.
View full review »We did not evaluate any other options. We considered looking at Barracuda’s offerings, but after a few days of evaluating HAProxy, we decided that it would be the best fit for us.
View full review »TP
Thomas Pike
ICT Manager at a non-profit with 51-200 employees
Yes. HAProxy was chosen as it met our needs and because of the generous donation of an HA license pair by the HAProxy team.
View full review »I did look at NGINX.
View full review »We strongly prefer to go with Open Source solutions. We evaluated https://www.loadbalancer.org/ as well. We went with Aloha because of the in-house expertise that Aloha has. The primary developer of HAProxy works there.
View full review »We did not evaluate other options before the solution. We were not happy with the solution's performance so we switched to Load Balancing Analytics.
View full review »OA
Oren Alexandroni
Senior Vice President of TechOps at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Citrix Netscaler and Kemp LoadMaster.
Yeah, but I don't remember it, because the other product was very bad in comparison to HAProxy.
View full review »We evaluated at least four to five other products.
View full review »We pretty much know all the software out there and its capabilities, so we did not evaluate anything else.
View full review »Other popular Load Balancer solutions out there
View full review »Buyer's Guide
HAProxy
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about HAProxy. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.