Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I won't say it's not a very stable tool, but it has some issues considering how we configured it in our organization.

It is a stable product.

I would rate the stability as a nine out of ten. We have experienced very few issues, and any problems, like an Xfinity issue, were quickly resolved within 24 hours.

The solution can be described as a robust product. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I would rate the tool's stability a ten out of ten. I have not experienced any form of downtime. 

Currently, we do not have enough experience regarding the full flash system's efficacy. We have new projects and we still have the old SimpliVity nodes. We have some POCs in the works in our environment.

Stability for us is a three-part factor.

First, with implementation, we ask, how smooth is the process? How meticulous and prepared is the implementer? Have they accounted for everything specific to our environment?

Second factor is the post-implementation hand-off. How does the implementer transfer control such that our team is confident and comfortable with being able to take ownership of the environment?

Finally, once implementation is complete and data is downloaded, are there periodic issues and how frequently must there by patches, upgrades, and maintenance?

These are all components of stability and, for us, ConvergedSystem has been very reliable and stable.

This solution is very stable.

As far as what we are doing now, there is no problem with stability. It's pretty flexible, it's efficient, and it is centralized management, cost-effective. I don't see a problem. The systems are good to go. It's just the people that they hired to do the implementation, I don't think they knew what they were doing. They were just learning with the clients.

So far, it's been a very stable solution. We had a problem six months ago, but support reacted very quickly and we were up and running again in one hour. It was a problem with one of the memory SIMs that was creating some problems. They changed in one hour.

Everything is intact, everything is perfect.

It's stable, which was the main reason I chose it. The CIO said that I was completely responsible for the solution and that I need to be comfortable with it.

I think it has been stable. We did have issues with the Dell blades, had some instability there. Again, it's brand new. Everything has been stable, though we've had an issue with the NICs reporting errors, but we think those are false reports. There's supposedly a patch, but the ConvergedSystem - as it was given to use and shipped to us - had errors.

I wouldn't expect that a well-tested, purpose-built appliance from HPE would report network errors. We're still trying to figure that out. I will say it seems to be false positives, possibly because the system is stable. But again, we don't have a big load on it because we're just now testing it, so I can't really speak to, when we scale it up, will it perform? Will it stay stable? But, for now, it's been stable.

The solution is incredibly stable. It's one of the great advantages of the product. We've never faced any problems when it comes to stability.

This is a stable solution.