I rate thee overall product an eight out of ten. 

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten because there is still room for improvement. 

Enterprises generally have the resources to handle the compute and storage requirements and can allocate additional resources for CyberArk management without significant issues. However, medium-sized companies need to exercise caution as they might need to hire dedicated resources for solution management, which can increase maintenance costs. Small organizations, on the other hand, are likely to face numerous challenges during upgrades, migrations, and maintenance due to their limited resources. CyberArk is best suited for larger enterprises.

Overall I would rate it an eight out of ten.

I would advise others that they should plan the network hardware integration well in order to bring it onto CyberArk Identity. They should also do adequate change management with administrators and users because CyberArk Identity does add a layer of extra complexity.

I rate CyberArk Identity an eight out of ten.

I recommend the solution to those planning to use it.

I recommend the solution to those planning to use it. The solution's potential users should ensure that you scale it properly and don't scale it beyond what is required because its performance lags.

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

I rate CyberArk Identity 10 out of 10.  Identity is the tool that offers the most seamless integration with UiPath Orchestrator and the most utility from an automation perspective.

We recommend CyberArk Identity to our customers.

Overall, I rate CyberArk Identity a six or six and a half out of ten.

I think maturity and overall coverage, CyberArk, obviously, has a lot more experience than many other vendors in this field. And, therefore, they have more wider range of tools and capabilities. But sometimes that's also a disadvantage that the newer vendors in the space often are more agile and more adaptable, especially to cloud environments and to, sort of, technologies that are more sort of, you know, cloud enabled. But overall, I would say CyberArk still has more maturity and more coverage in less than this.

I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten. 

I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. We have enterprise-based customers for the solution. I think Okta is a good solution compared to CyberArk.

I rate CyberArk Identity an eight out of ten. 

I'm a member of the project team, we primarily use this tool whenever we need to work on this. Otherwise, we don't use it on a daily basis.

In terms of the customer requirement, we use it whenever we are required to work on these tools.

I am an employee, and my company is a partner with CyberArk.

I would rate CyberArk Identity a nine out of ten.

I would rate CyberArk Identity with a nine out of ten. 

I rate CyberArk Identity an eight out of ten.

I am an implementer.

We're using a cloud-based version and therefore, I'm always on the latest version.

CyberArk is very easy. New users can use it in their environment as an MFA provider or a single sign-on provider. If you check the competition between other solutions, CyberArk is providing the identity security with more quality.

I'm in sales.

I'm not sure which version of the solution is being used.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

The product is good, but they have a weakness in the Japanese market without a service person.

I would rate this solution eight out of ten.

I am happy with this solution. I would rate Idaptive a ten out of ten.