We did see an ROI. Before, there were issues with the data warehouse and its use. My clients have seen improvements in the efficiency and implementation of the data. They can use the data much better and utilize it for solutions.

I would rate the ROI a nine out of ten, where one is zero value and ten is 100% value. 

Maybe it takes over a period of two or three years to see an ROI of maybe 50% to 70%. 

The solution has helped to predict sales and focus attention on enhancements that have improved the bottom line. 

I rate the ROI a six out of ten. 

The solution is worth the cost for our use case, it is worth the money. Despite the fact that there may be room for further optimization of its complete power, the cost-to-flexibility ratio of Synapse is quite favorable. I do not have any specific metrics to support my statement, however, I can assure you that Synapse is not inadequate or disappointing in any manner.

If I hosted a Microsoft setup on premise, I would need to invest in licensing for different tools and services, SQL server, SSIS, SSRS, Power BI or SSAS. Compared to this if you use Azure Synapse, the return on investment is very high. You get rid of your hardware, licensing and you move to a subscription based pay as you use model. Your operational costs reduce and your optimization increases. Capital expenditure absolutely diminishes and you move to an OpEx model. 

Finally, the overall management of it is simplified as compared to on premise. This of course leads to high RoI. 

It's difficult to compute a return on investment in data analytics.

We're getting a good ROI from Synapse Analytics.

Having used the serverless option for the database has saved us a lot of money.

I don't have exact KPIs on this, however, I need to improve the sizing in order to improve our ROI.

We have seen ROI, for sure, but I cannot provide any numbers.