Microsoft DPM Reviews

This solution is part of our main disaster recovery as well as long term recovery solution policy. It will work on physical and virtual machines.

Moving to this solution has improved our backup capability. Zerto is only able to replicate virtual machines whereas DPM is capable of backing up everything.

The most valuable feature is that DPM has an index so individual files can be searched. This is our primary tool for recovering deleted files or folders. Once we implement a System Center Operations Manager, all of our DPM servers can then be seen on one dashboard.

Additional Hyper-V knowledge would be great. There are some articles online detailing the interaction with hypervisors. Using the built-in tools would speed up some of the normal routine procedures.

I have been using Microsoft DPM for over three years.

It is a stable product.

DPM is easily scalable. There is a database stored on a SQL server in which the size needs to be monitored.

Prior to using DPM, we used Zerto.

Zerto has a fast recovery of entire machines whereas DPM has an index so individual files can be searched. DPM is capable of backing up both physical and virtual machines.

There were some quirks in the initial setup. I needed to make certain the SQL versions and reporting was completely patched but not necessarily updated. DPM is only happy with certain versions so do not upgrade SQL to the latest and greatest. Follow guidelines laid out on the Microsoft-DPM web sites.

On-premises

We primarily use the solution as a backup. We have some standalone and beta on it, however, we haven't got the whole stack on it now.

It has improved the organisation by taking care of disaster recovery.

The solution works well as a backup.

The initial setup is quite straightforward.

You can scale the solution easily.

The stability is very good.

The user interface can be improved quite a bit.

Overall, I wouldn't describe the solution as user-friendly. It's not very intuitive.

The issue is that for users who are not interacting with the product regularly, it becomes difficult to trace the various functionality available. The product version that we have does not have

I've been using the solution for almost a decade at this point. It's been about nine years. It's been a while.

The solution is stable and reliable. It doesn't crash or break down. There aren't bugs or glitches. It works well.

The solution can scale if you need it to. That's not a problem at all.

We have about 200 users on the solution right now.

I'm unsure as to if we will increase usage in the future. That's not due to the nature of its scalability. Rather, we find it's not user-friendly enough.

We've been satisfied with technical support so far. They are knowledgable and responsive. I have no complaints about their level of service.

I wouldn't describe the initial setup as complex. It's pretty straightforward.

The deployment doesn't take too long. It takes about an hour in total to do everything you need to do.

I handled the implementation myself. I didn't need the assistance of a consultant or integrator. It was handled in-house.

I bought the license for the solution from Microsoft as part of System Center. I'm not sure of the exact cost of the solution.

We did test a couple of other different solutions before we ultimately chose DPM.

We're just Microsoft customers. We don't have a business relationship with the company.

I believe that I am using the latest version of the solution. We got into later versions as we didn't use the beta version.

I wouldn't recommend this solution to others right now. It's not user-friendly enough. That level of annoyance with the product can really kill it.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. They used to give away this product and they stopped doing that. It would be nice if they returned to having it as a free solution. It would also be nice if they took some time to reconsider its design in order to make it more user-friendly in the future.

On-premises

It is almost perfect for Microsoft products. It is not a very powerful tool, but it is okay for small sites and small businesses with Microsoft products.

It is easy to use for backup and restore. It is good for backing up Microsoft servers such as Exchange and SharePoint servers.

It needs portability for other vendors. It is good for backing up Microsoft servers, but it doesn't support third-party solutions such as Oracle Database. 

It depends on Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy, especially for Hyper-V, which has a lot of problems. They should enhance the Volume Shadow Copy functionality. 

Its reporting should also be better. Reporting is too weak in DPM.

I have been using this solution for six years.

It is stable.

It is scalable.

Their technical support is moderate. I am an expert in DPM, so I don't need support many times.

Its installation is straightforward. It takes one hour at the most.

I installed it myself.

I would recommend this solution for small businesses and small sites. I plan to keep using this solution.

I would rate Microsoft DPM a seven out of ten.

On-premises

We are using this product for backing up our entire environment, which includes our ERP and all of the other systems that we have.

The whole idea for doing a backup is to be able to fully recover and restore, and some of the options are quite good for us. We have been happy with the recovery tasks that we've carried out.

The automated procedure is quite good for us, as it is able to capture all of the information that we require.

The compatibility is very good. We have an IBM AS/400 machine in our office that we're using, and we're able to back it up fine. This is the same for other systems, as well. I think that overall, it is really adaptable, compatible, and scalable.

Management reporting could be improved.

I have been using Microsoft DPM for the past four years.

I think that Microsoft DPM is very stable. We are a local authority and we are running multiple health information systems, engineering, and financial systems.

We have a vast number of systems and we're scaling up to more than 4,000 users. As of now, we have been able to scale up to our requirements.

We have been in contact with Microsoft technical support here and there. We have a local supplier that we work with, and it is important to keep in mind that DPM isn't the only product that we are using. We also use a configuration manager, an operations manager, and a service manager which is the service desk. The entire set is the Management Suite.

In terms of response time, they are okay. However, we've had an issue with not being about to get the kind of reports that we want in terms of managing our environment.

The initial setup was really straightforward and we didn't have any challenges. It took us between two and three weeks to deploy.

We completed the implementation and deployment in-house and without any issues.

Our IT department is divided into four groups which are security, infrastructure networks, MIS, and solutions. We have three engineers who are responsible for DPM.

We are currently working with an on-premises deployment but we want to use the hybrid option now. We are looking forward to seeing how it performs.

To this point, from what we have been using, we have found this product to be okay and we haven't had any major issues. We are happy with the features that we have.

Overall, we are happy with this product. At the same time, I cannot give it a perfect rating until I see how well it scales in the cloud.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

On-premises

My work is on the customer side. I analyze a company's situation and figure out what's best for them from a cost perspective and an installation perspective. I'm a customer of Microsoft and managing director of the company. 

I would definitely recommend data protection DPM. It has an application backup, a file backup, a system backup and a hypervisor. It works flawlessly, never a problem.

They could improve the compatibility and integration with other products and the ability to do file-to file backups of other products. I also find the hard disk aligning quite complicated and that should be simplified. 

I've been using this solution for nine years. 

The scalability of the solution is fine for Microsoft products, but there are issues when it comes to backing up other databases because I cannot take the file-to-file backup which creates some problems. 

From the time you purchase the support they're there to help you. The price is good and that helps. There isn't a price match for DPM right now in the market.

Deployment time depends on the user case; how many servers you have, etc. However, the basic installation can probably be done in two or three hours. Configuration depends on the products you're backing up, how many there are and the number of servers. I have my own team for deployment and I'm also Microsoft certified.

I recommend Microsoft DPM as it is a cost-effective solution that works. It's worth checking the limitations of DPM before deployment, which can be done by reading the documentation. Make sure it's suitable for your needs and that it's going to work for you.

I would rate this solution a seven out of 10. 

Hybrid Cloud

Ease of D2D and D2T backups.

Fast restores

In the areas of disaster recovery.

2.5 years.

Recent minor upgrade required a reboot of all of my protected 2008 servers. This I considered unacceptable as I had to reschedule an outage window to reboot 100+ servers. 

Yes, occasionally protection will stop working say for a simple system state backup.  

Microsoft support for this product is very good. Open a web ticket and they will call you and still maintain the ticket as a web ticket

Organization used BUExec but migrated to DPM because of Microsoft licensing and cost to maintain BUExec.

Straightforward.

In-house implementation.

Not given opportunity by management to evaluate additional products.

Very good for Microsoft workloads. 

I primarily use the solution for my documentation projects.

The user interface is very good. The reporting and monitoring features are also good.

The data tagging feature needs improvement. The solution could be a bit more intuitive in certain aspects. 

I've been using the solution for three years.

The solution is stable. We've never had any issues.

Technical support is good. We're satisfied with the level of support we get.

The initial setup is very easy. Deployment takes less than an hour.

We did use consultants to assist with some features.

We use the on-premises deployment model.

Overall, I really like the product. There's not really any feature that is missing.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. it's very user-friendly, and I can do everything I need to do. It's very simple for me to use.

Recovery.

Yes: failure of primary; agent resource use.

I'm afraid I fail to see how the CEO of a 500+ employee company can be a "real user" in any relevant sense. The real hands-on experience with DPM is that it's difficult to set up unless you get it right first time, the agent processes gobble CPU and i/o, and if you're unfortunate enough for your DPM primary to go awol, you're faced with building a complete DPM network again because the secondary/ies will refuse full backups if the primary isn't there.