The primary use case is the same use case as Splunk.
Requirements differ. We're still doing fine-tuning. However, lots of users are added to its security group to note activities.
The primary use case is the same use case as Splunk.
Requirements differ. We're still doing fine-tuning. However, lots of users are added to its security group to note activities.
So far, the solution has been perfect.
The pricing of the product is excellent.
So far, we have found the stability to be very good.
The solution, as a SIEM tool, has very good integration capabilities, at least, according to our needs.
We have just recently migrated to this product. We haven't used it long enough to note all of the features. Therefore, it would be impossible to note what is lacking just yet.
The interface could be more user-friendly. It''s a small improvement that they could make if they wanted to.
We've recently migrated to this solution. We've only been using it for a month.
The stability of the product is very good. It doesn't have bugs. It's not glitchy. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's been reliable so far.
As a Microsoft product, customers get scalability and elasticity. We have policies in place, and, based on them, we can upgrade if we need to. A company shouldn't have issues scaling should they have the need to expand.
Only the security team uses this product. It's not accessible for every user. We have a team of about 20.
We have just invested in the solution, and therefore we have plans to use it for the foreseeable future.
We do have access to support, and if we need them, we can call on them. However, the solution is so new, we have yet to need their services. Therefore, I can't speak to their level of responsiveness or knowledgeability just yet.
The installation is very straightforward and easy. It's not complex. It's a cloud deployment, and therefore, it is very quick. You just connect the APIs to the data center.
The product is extremely cost-effective and affordable for customers.
I'm more on the technical side. Therefore, I don't have any insights into the actual cost or the structure of the license.
We looked at Splunk as well and compared to that solution, this one is less expensive.
We're using the latest version of the solution.
Choosing this solution was a management decision. Due to cost-effectiveness, they opted for Azure Sentinel.
Whether this product would work for another organization or not depends on the company's requirements.
As it is still very early in terms of our experience with the solution, I would rate the product at a six out of ten.
It is for tracking the logs. I'm working on automation. So, the use case basically includes logs, incidents, automation, UEBA, and endpoint integration with Office 365 Defender.
We didn't have anything similar. So, it really provides value from the incidents and automation point of view. The overview of the security fabric is most valuable.
Its implementation could be simpler. It is not really simple or straightforward. It is in the middle. Sometimes, connectors are a little bit complex.
I just started using it. I have just set it up.
It is stable.
It is scalable.
I haven't dealt with Microsoft's tech support. I haven't reached out to them.
It was of medium complexity. It wasn't too bad, but it can be complex because of the connectors.
I don't know yet because they gave us a 30-day test window for free.
Because it is mainly artificial intelligence and machine learning, you would need some time to learn it. It is a good solution, and it is straightforward.
I would rate it a six out of 10. I haven't really dealt with other ones.
For users that have been observing some malicious actions with their product and getting malicious mail, Azure Sentinel allows them to create a rule, which will show who exactly among their users is exposed to phishing attacks so that they can make some mitigation on that particular account.
There are about five people using this solution in my organization.
It helps to implement connectors for Microsoft solutions, available out of the box and providing real-time integration, including Microsoft 365 Defender (formerly Microsoft Threat Protection) solutions, and Microsoft 365 sources, including Office 365, Azure AD, Microsoft Defender for Identity (formerly Azure ATP), and Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, and more. In addition, there are built-in connectors to the broader security ecosystem for non-Microsoft solutions
The most valuable feature is the onboarding of the workloads. You can see all that has been onboarded in your account on the dashboards.
It has been a challenge with Azure Sentinel to onboard the Syslog server from FortiGate. Azure Sentinel can work better on that shift between the Syslog server and a firewall.
I have been using this solution for three years.
It's very scalable.
Technical support is good. Microsoft has engineers that are readily available to help you with a challenge.
Initial setup was user friendly. I would rate it a 4 out of 5.
It's deployed by you onboarding your deliverables on the workload. For example, if you're using Office 365 or another third-party solution, you're going to upload those onto the server and have it protected with your Azure Sentinel.
It will draw logs from those your activities, and then bring it up as a workbook, where you can see into the actions on those programs you have onboarded on the Azure Sentinel.
We use a third-party for implementation.
For ROI, I would rate it 4 out of 5.
It's costly to maintain and renew.
It depends on how you want to pay for the solution. You can pay it on an annual basis or pay as you go, but I feel it's better to just keep it running as a product on your Azure subscription. If you have a $500 subscription, it will take part of your subscription.
I would rate this solution 7 out of 10.
We are security system integrators.
We have no complaints about the features or functionality.
Azure Sentinel, the Microsoft Azure product is, from what I understand, used for the Microsoft applications. I don't know if it works outside of the Microsoft Azure cloud.
I would like to be able to monitor applications outside of the Azure Cloud. That is one of the reasons one of the customers has multiple tools.
I have been using Azure Sentinel for approximately one year.
It's free. It comes with a Microsoft subscription which the customer has, so they don't have to invest somewhere else. That'd be great if it was supporting other things.
If it's a security integrator like us, quite often people push the client into buying different vendors' products and the client already has the tool in-house. Microsoft is one of those tools that most clients already have.
Many vendors, or integrators, that we know of, are not familiar with Microsoft Sentinel product classification security. So that's one thing I would encourage both potential customers, and users, to look into what suite of products do they have with existing Microsoft accounts that they have.
Also, the integrators should be quite familiar with all the things that are available to their clients, so they don't have to invest tons of money in other tools.
Based on having no complaints, I would rate Azure Sentinel an eight out of ten.
We use it on a public cloud. We have integrated Azure Lighthouse with Azure Sentinel Security. By integrating all of these, Azure Security Center and Azure Defender, we are providing an MSSP platform to our customers.
With other solutions, you see some restrictions for collecting the log from custom connectors. With Azure Sentinel, we do have some restrictions or sometimes we need to struggle with the connection, but there is no need to struggle with the log connection. There is 100% integration to your enterprise environment. This makes it easy to monitor and keep a track record for vulnerabilities and track whatever things are lurking in your network. They also have their custom alert tools, alerting the analytics team, where we can receive custom alerts based on our custom requirements. This has helped our organization a lot. Then with Azure Lighthouse, we can manage multiple customers with one platform, so on a single interface, we manage a number of customers that are using the Lighthouse service from the Azure.
In Azure Sentinel, we have found, they do have a store in their capability. AI and intelligence features. We found that to be very helpful for us because some other things we do need to integrate again or find another vendor for the store With Azure it is a built-in thing, so there is no need to go and search for another vendor or integrate your solution for the store with a third-party.
They could use some kind of workbook. There is some limitation doing the editing and creating the workbook. That would improve it. Sometimes you will find some network issue, and network error with the Azure Sentinel portal. That's the biggest drawback I found with the Sentinel. It would be great if would provide PIP platforms. They do have PI platforms but they don't have PIP.
My organization partners with Microsoft, so we are working on an MSSP with Azure.
The technical support for Azure Sentinel is quite good. You have one level up from the basic support so you will definitely get to Microsoft support directly and actually have a conversation with Microsoft technical guys for the support team and they will resolve your issues very quickly.
The setup for Azure Sentinel is very straightforward. You only need a subscription and for that subscription, you just need the admin roles. So if you are an admin and if you do have the Microsoft certification, you can make a Microsoft Azure account then it's very easy to setup and it's very easy to onboard the Sentinel.
Azure Sentinel s actually quite handy, and very adaptive to the market trends. Anyone who is looking for the same store, creating their complete security solution for their enterprise, for the effective security solution, and for data integration, they must go with the Azure Sentinel as they are going to get everything in one place. I would rate Azure Sentinel at an eight on a scale of ten.