Omada Identity Room for Improvement
Generally, I find the whole solution to be very good. But the way errors in the system are handled could be improved. If you find an error and you need it fixed, you have to upgrade. It's not like they say, "Okay, we'll fix this problem for you." You have to upgrade. The last time we upgraded, because there was an error in a previous version, we had to pay 150,000 Danish Krone (about $24,000 at the time of this review) to upgrade our systems. This is a very big issue for us because 150,000 Krone is a lot of money. And because we have production, test, and developer environments, we had to upgrade them all. The fact that we can't have an error fixed but, rather, we have to upgrade, annoys us a little. That means that we have to pay to get errors fixed that Omada has made in programming the system. I hope they change this way of looking at things.View full review »
Error handling can be improved. From an on-premise perspective, internal support can be improved. It is quite a technical and difficult application to maintain. A very specialized skill set is required to operate and maintain it, which is the most difficult part. The process to upgrade versions is also quite tricky.
One thing that we are not so happy about is the user interface. It is a bit dated. I know that they are working on that, but the user interface is quite dated. Currently, it is a little bit difficult to customize the user interface to the need of the business, which is a little bit disappointing. It needs it to be a little bit easier to operate, and it should have a better user interface.
Their technical support is good, but there is room for improvement. It is not an easy product to support. They helped us set it up a little bit, but it gets difficult for them to handle more complex problems.View full review »
Functional Administrator at Gemeente Utrecht
I would like to search on date fields, which is not possible now.
I am unable to connect our organizations' tables and our partners to create a report in the solution. Sometimes you have to connect two different tables of your report. For now, I make a report for one, then I make a report for the other. After that, I combine them in Excel, but this is time-consuming. We are waiting for the newest version to come out at the end of the month. Hopefully, the feature to connect to other applications will be available with this release. Otherwise, we will have to wait for the next one. It would be nicer if we could get it sooner.View full review »
Chief Security Strategist at Clango
The Omada Identity SaaS version isn't as flexible as Omada Identity on-premise. It is expected behavior though. Often, customers under estimate the level of controls and flexibility when moving to SaaS. We want customers to carefully evaluate and analyze each use case and/or requirement.
We work closely with Omada and understand the roadmap, which addresses what market is demanding, incrementally in each release.
Identity and Access Program Owner at a government with 10,001+ employees
Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated.
Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues.View full review »
IAM Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
In terms of improvement, there are not so many out of the box connectors available in the current version. So what they have improved in the latest version is more out of the box connectors for integration, that is one improvement.
Then there is the recertification process. When the recertification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version.