Qlik Sense Reviews

• Complex data modeling
• Qlik DataMarket

• Automated a lot of manual reports to save business users' time.
• Provides valuable info with business intelligence analytics.

Reload time is a limit since everyone wants real-time data.

One year for Qlik Sense.

No.

Takes up a lot of memory.

No.

A nine out of 10.

A nine out of 10.

QlikView. Qlik Sense is a newer version, and more user-friendly, with no charge for servers.

No.

Vendor Team using virtual-consulting, which is not very efficient.

I don't know.

Licensing could be cheaper.

Yes, Tableau.

I am very excited about the future generations of Qlik Sense and Qlik Market.

Quick reporting.

Logistics work more efficient in real-time data.

More options for the layout.

1 year

Not really.

Not really.

Not really. The solution is scalable.

7/10

8/10

We did not look at any other solutions.

Not complex, straightforward.

8

3 years

The solution is worth it.

We did not.

Keep following the chosen direction.

Modern user interface and integration capabilities are the most valuable features of the product, to me.

This product has improved the way my organization functions by spreading the use of BI.

I have used Qlik Sense 2.2 for one year.

We have some problems with sessions closing down before the timeout limit.

I rate technical support 10/10.

We used MS Analysis Server & MS Reporting Services for some years and compared to Qlik products, it was inflexible, old-fashioned and slow.

Initial setup was straightforward as an all-in-one product, compared to Microsoft’s product stack.

An in-house team implemented it.

In the starter pack, you get a lot and the ROI is definitely less than a year.

I would recommend it to anyone who is looking for an online reporting and analysis BI product. Not to use only as a report generator; it's far more useful than that.

• Self-service BI capabilities

Faster information delivery and enhanced decision making are examples of how it has improved the way my organization functions.

• More functionality which can be built in instead of third-party vendor API/extensions

I have used it for one year.

We have not encountered any deployment issues.

We have not encountered any stability issues.

We have not encountered any scalability issues.

Customer service is very good.

Technical support is good.

We previously used QlikView. We switched because QlikSense has better visualization capabilities.

An in-house team implemented it.

• More decision making
• Cost saving
• Program development for more sales and revenue generation

It has the best pricing and licensing.

Before choosing this product, we did not evaluate other options.

Self-Service in an on-premises environment with the aim to industrialize self-service content. That means the IT department will take responsibility for developed reports after their development is done by the business.

Qlik Sense brought Self-Service reporting into the company, thanks to the easy UI for business users.

The most valuable feature is the drag-and-drop reporting.

We would like to have connectors without the need for the Web Connector service.

Report generation without the need for NPrinting, which has limited capabilities anyway, would be an improvement.

We have been using Qlik Sense for more than one year.

Fast implementation, easy to use and allows users to make their own analysis in a very simple way.

I miss some of the functions found in their previous product, QlikView, such as dynamic (written by a function) expression or sheet name labels in order to create multi-language applications.

We have been implementing Qlik Sense for two years.

There were some bugs. Most of them were fixed with newer versions.

This area has to improve. Technical support is at a low level.

I used to implement QlikView. The main advantages of Qlik Sense are responsive design and that it is easier to use.

Installation and other setup are really straightforward.

I work for a tech services company and I would say there are still more "in-house" implementations with our support and guidance.

I like the pricing because it is very clear.

No specific advice, but I would say "go for it". :)

I have never had a disappointed customer.

• Building data models and dashboards for my company clients
• Installation and support of Qlik Sense servers
• Maintaining these servers 
• Building a new dashboard 
• What-if scenarios, according to business needs.

A great analysis tool helps us in many ways for showing the great potential of our ERP through Qlik tools.

• Drag and drop 
• Excel exporting on the same view and selection of exported graphs
• Multi-data source connectivity. 

• Real online analytics (OLAP)
• Better implementation of map charts
• Incremental data load solution for better time saving. 

Its ease of use. No code is necessary to build a nice panel that works for desktops and mobiles.

You can add customized graphics made by the Github community! (branch.qlik.com)

Previous Qlikview panels were rebuilt using Qlik Sense, spending 1/10 of the time.

It needs more statistical functions similar to those that Qlikview has.

I've used it for the last year.

We've had no issues deploying it.

We've had no issues with the stability.

Qlik Sense has the option to use the Qlik Cloud as a repository that enables you to show your panel or presentation anywhere if you don't have a server.

The Qlik community is the best way to improve, fix and learn the product. Qlik releases new version constantly.

You just need to click next, next, choose your directory and finish.

We have only implemented the cloud version.

As it is easy to share without the document constraints of Qlikview, buying it will be necessary only for future publications under our corporate site.

Qlik Sense is aligned to compete with Tableau "shoulder to shoulder".

It is a great product for people who don't need deep stats and have no programming background. Qlik cloud's performance is an issue, as it has no costs - the resources are shared.

A view at a glance of Brazilian ports dockings: