Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Previous Solutions
We used to use Tivoli. We also use AppDynamics in addition to Splunk for different parts, but we are starting to learn that Splunk does have a lot of similar toolsets. Splunk does the same as what AppDynamics does, and in some cases, there are more powerful tool sets that would help us. We are thinking of petering down our different tools to get into one tool, possibly Splunk. We already got rid of Tivoli, and we are using Splunk fully in place of Tivoli. We have seen a positive response to it.
We have seen cost efficiencies by switching to this solution. Because of the wider range of tools that Splunk offers, we were able to get rid of Tivoli and get rid of that licensing obligation on an annual basis. We are able to save a good amount of money on that and move that budget over to our Splunk budget to keep everything under one umbrella.
View full review »We previously used Datadog but it doesn't offer network monitoring features like CPU utilization or overall server performance, which Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring does, so we switched.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring offers more functionality and visibility, making it a better choice for handling cloud architecture compared to Datadog.
View full review »CJ
reviewer2239860
Software Engineer at a logistics company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We have used different solutions in the past. I used CA Wily. New Relic was another tool we had used for a time.
We had several different tools that we were using for APM monitoring and website monitoring. Over time, we migrated more to the Splunk platform because it helps to aggregate the data. Having to configure all the agents was painful, and Splunk made that a lot easier.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SM
Siraj Moosakoya.
Senior Network Administrator at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Before Splunk, we used multiple vendors, including Cisco, SolarWinds NPM, and WhatsUp Gold.
View full review »We also use Cisco for EDR since Splunk doesn't really have any EDR options.
View full review »We did not have a previous solution like Splunk, other than in-house-developed tools. We got acquainted with Splunk as part of the tender for our network infrastructure, and from that perspective, it has been okay.
View full review »I have worked with Kibana and Logstash, but they are not comparable to this solution.
View full review »ON
Olivier Ntumba
Network & Systems Administrator Individual Contributor at T-Systems
I used other solutions before, which were LiveAction, and Cisco Prime. They were used to monitor.
Currently, I'm using PRTG for network monitoring, to monitor the network devices. With Splunk, we monitor servers, and with PRTG, we monitor the network devices such as routers, IPs, and switches.
SM
Siraj Moosakoya
Senior Network Administrator at Tawasul telecom
I have used multiple solutions, and I find that searching the logs in this solution is very quick.
View full review »We have used ArcSight and Elasticsearch.
View full review »AE
Abdullah El Deeb
Technical Consultant/Instructor at SIGMA IT
We're also currently using IBM Pure Adarius. Although we do use both consecutively, I do prefer Splunk. It's more digital and more open.
View full review »We use both Splunk and another solution simultaneously for somewhat different purposes.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.