Telerik Test Studio Room for Improvement
There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required.
The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.
View full review »Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy. In addition, sometimes, tests used to fail intermittently. These were the two disadvantages.
KD
Kalyani Dasi
Sr Test Lead
With my limited knowledge of Telerik Test Studio, I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. My team had to use a lot of code to get Telerik Test Studio to read the data and get results. A beginner would need to ask for help from developers to become more confident with Excel validation.
I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding.
What I want to be added in the next release of Telerik Test Studio is end-to-end testing, where you can integrate the tool with a database. I'm not sure if that exists, but I want more of it if it does. I also want more document validations on Telerik Test Studio that require minimal coding.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, SeleniumHQ, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
CK
Chetan Kousadikar
Senior Software Engineer at Xylem
The product could be improved by implementing a feature that allows users to select multiple different file types simultaneously. For example, it could provide the user with the ability to choose a Word Doc, PDF and Excel file at the same time.
View full review »SR
ShivekRughoobur
System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The customization could be improved. The first time I customized the solution, it was quite challenging.
The charts need to be more detailed and customizable.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, SeleniumHQ, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.