We're partners. 

I've used, from the very beginning, the fourth version. Now I'm using the 6.5 version. 

I've been pleased with the solution. It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Always perform thorough testing before going into production because sometimes the APIs are not stable. It's important to validate your scenarios before production to avoid issues and disruptions in the APIs, especially in new integrations.

I would rate it around eight out of ten. I really appreciate the product because it's user-friendly and easy to develop with, once you grasp the basics. If you have a good understanding of its fundamentals, you can accomplish anything with it. It's a very good product in that regard.

I highly recommend this solution to anyone who is considering its use.

I would rate WSO2 Enterprise Integrator a nine out of ten.

In the starting phase, the process is the same, like integration and data thinking, and observation. In WSO, we proceed with managing the whole requirement and setup. We cannot manage the coding, but we can manage the steps. 

So, if you want to make any type of application, first, you need to open our platform, choose the bar, select the application, and put your effort into it. It's a simple process, but it's a preference, sir. It's a different way.

Overall, I would rate WSO2 Enterprise Integrator a seven out of ten.  While WSO2 is easy to use, it cannot handle certain tasks that their AWS server requires. For example, IBM Integration Bus can handle 1000 clients in one second, whereas WSO2 cannot handle the whole scenario in a good way. It is a good product overall but has room for improvement in certain areas.

I rate the overall tool a seven out of ten.

This product is more like an accelerator, which helps your business go fast. These are among very few solutions available for security purposes, in terms of banking accelerators and other enterprises. If you want to accelerate your products and business, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator can be a good solution. It is organic and makes everything visually easy to understand and operate.

Overall, I would rate the product a nine out of ten.

It is a good product. However, I haven't been in touch with the most recent security patches. I don't have anything negative to say about the product. I would rate it as a six out of ten. There is a scope for improvement at the same time. I haven't used the product extensively enough to say that it is the best product.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by including validation exports for XPath. I recommend this solution to people considering it.

I would rate WSO2 Enterprise Integrator an eight out of ten.

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. 

I'd recommend the product to others. It was issue free while I used it. 

If you have a legacy system, you can use this product. It is really, really easy.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten overall.

We are using the most current update of the product.

I'd advise new users to evaluate the features of the product versus the requirements and to make sure that this is a good fit before committing to the product.

I'd rate the solution five out of ten, basically in the middle. I wasn't involved with the tool from the very beginning, and now we are moving away from it. I may not be the best source of information on the intricacies of the product itself. 

We are a partner with the company.

We always use on-premises deployments as we only work with on-prem.

While I am still exploring the solution, I've so far been pretty satisfied with it. I'd rate it at a nine out of ten so far.

From my experience so far, I would recommend the solution to other users and companies. It's very customizable and the support is there if you need help. Of course, we are still in the design phase, and it is still early.

Future users should keep in mind that they will need at least a little bit of guidance from an API manager. It is not likely that they will be able to just install and handle it directly. They will need some bit of guidance and support. 

We don't use the cloud version; we have our own servers.

I would rate this solution eight out of ten.

I recommend the solution to others and rate it as a nine.

My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to start with a proof of concept project. That will allow them to properly scale it or benchmark it for their internal capacity.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

It is a good solution. It has many integration components. 

I would rate it a six out of ten. Not a ten because it's not so easy and it's a little difficult to deploy on a platform. It is difficult to build a high availability platform.

In the next release, it should be faster.