We performed a comparison between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It's very easy to get started on the solution. It's also easy to maintain, scale, and integrate according to cost factors."
"People are able to scale up, learn it quickly, and start delivering."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the SFTP adapters, file adapters, and risk adapters, that we use in everyday projects."
"The initial setup of Oracle Integration Cloud Service was easy."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"OIC's accuracy is quite good."
"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."
"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."
"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."
"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."
"The installation process is easy."
"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."
"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."
"The learning curve for this solution is very good."
"There is a payload size limit and we're unable to integrate some legacy applications."
"The solution doesn't currently have a fully fledged workflow feature like they have in OIM."
"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release."
"Lacks features for more complex integrations."
"While most of the adapters are available through Oracle Integration Cloud Services, they do not have a lot of features. I would like to see some enrichment in this area and for the solution to go deeper into the applications and upgrade the adapters."
"If an inbound file is larger than one GB, it cannot be transformed within Oracle."
"The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"You cannot include the validation of XPath."
"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."
"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"They should introduce better pricing for small companies."
"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."
"They should release upgrades more frequently."
"The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 19th in Data Integration with 18 reviews. Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate and Azure Data Factory, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and SSIS. See our Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.