We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation and Automic Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation."I think on a day-to-day basis, it has increased the capacity to deploy. We don't have to wait for someone to do something."
"Deployment workflow (WF) can be designed this way, so that it is not necessary to provide all applications (systems) artifacts of which an application consists."
"It provides a wonderful user interface which is easy to use."
"The metrics gathered after deployment, for example, the rate of success versus the rate of failure."
"Gives people insight into what's happening during the deployment."
"We have saved on our time costs and have seen more quality."
"Self-service for developers, because they are able to deploy to development departments on their own, without needing people from operations."
"It gives us good feedback on visualizations and on how our processes have progressed."
"It enables us to build automation which is flexible in a controlled environment."
"The most valuable features are the predefined templates for application-specific jobs and the access for different users."
"The most valuable feature is it always runs things automatically that you normally have to do manually, like download files."
"It is technology agnostic. It works with all the different legacy solutions we have and it allows us to look at things in one location, as opposed to going to a lot of different places."
"They just talked about adding support for hundreds of thousands of agents, and I know it goes up to about a thousand clients per engine, so you can do a lot with that. It's a very scalable solution."
"Workload Automation's most valuable features are perspective analytics and coding."
"It works to automate business processes over all the systems. You have a central point where you can automate everything."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the scheduler."
"There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them."
"At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2."
"There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system."
"We hope that we can integrate the new CD Directive into our portfolio, so we can bring the deployment and release management closer together."
"key thing is support for cloud-based deployment. That is lacking."
"Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement."
"GUI for mobile phones: Availability to approve and start deployment through mobile phones."
"I would like to see more support for WebSphere."
"Content of file transfers cannot be searched by the system, but has to be done by the user interface. This is not good, as it has been erased often."
"The tool lacks interoperability features."
"There has to be a better way to visualize things in the application without having so many windows open."
"They need to handle cross datacenter failover. They have a really good High Availability solution that works well within a single sysplex, but in our environment, since we have two main datacenter locations, we have two separate sysplex."
"I would like more training on workload automation, because I do not have a complete insight of the product yet."
"We would like some advantages, which we had with the Java UI, with the automation engine."
"The pricing has the potential to be high."
"There could be a better user interface for end users. They should make it more intuitive, not based on Java."
More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is ranked 17th in Release Automation while Automic Workload Automation is ranked 7th in Workload Automation with 85 reviews. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is rated 8.0, while Automic Workload Automation is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Automic Continuous Delivery Automation writes "Reduces our time to market considerably with automated and consistent results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Automic Workload Automation writes "A tool requiring an easy setup phase that provides its users with flexibility and flow chart visibility ". Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is most compared with Nolio Release Automation and UrbanCode Deploy, whereas Automic Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Dollar Universe Workload Automation and AppWorx Workload Automation.
We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
