We performed a comparison between BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite and ManageEngine Endpoint Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."It is a comprehensive security solution that not only controls access to enterprise resources but also tracks and prevents unauthorized access, ensuring the protection of sensitive data and preventing potential data loss scenarios."
"Stable product that's easy to set up compared to other MDM products."
"We have found the solution is capable of scaling."
"If you need only to load a specific profile and you don't have deep security functionalities, et cetera, Intune is very nice and good."
"It has a useful device management feature."
"The conditional access policies that we set up are very useful."
"We have not experienced any bugs or glitches with this solution."
"The most valuable feature of Intune is the central dashboard for compliance and policy management."
"It was a big improvement to activate applications with one authentication. That was a big plus for the user experience."
"If a device is stolen, you have the power to remove all of the contents remotely. You can do this very quickly."
"It has a good ease of use, and its intuitive."
"It has allowed us to manage many different mobile device platforms, like Windows 10, Android, Apple, and BlackBerry 10, all through a single pane of glass."
"We are able to separate personal information and in the event of e breach, we are able to turn off access and/or delete this information."
"It keeps things secure, it can remotely wipe the container and it's fairly easy to use."
"It gives us the ability to have a container and the most secure possible application."
"Access to the emails on the go was most valuable. Having access to your emails in a secure way is one of the most important features of this solution. Blackberry ensures data security, and as a user, I can use it while on roaming or wherever I am."
"The solution's stability is better than the other solutions in the market."
"The most important feature we found to be useful in the COVID situation is the secure connection, which gives the IT support staff the ability to seamlessly connect with the users remotely and in a secure way."
"Page management and ADA integrations are the most valuable features of ManageEngine Endpoint Central."
"Identification of gaps and filling the gaps with updates are most valuable. We are able to identify known updates or missing updates and then update."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"ManageEngine Desktop Central's most valuable features are remote desktop control and image management. We can send things out from the desk here, it is a very good tool for us."
"Since deploying Desktop Central our endpoints are all updated. We use configuration management to deploy shortcuts to our users' desktops with ease. Also, we use configuration management to map logical hard drives to our users. Our users are very happy with how much ease IT can solve their problems."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Patch Management."
"Microsoft Intune could enhance its patch management for various devices, ensuring regular updates and tracking of device privileges."
"While Intune works perfectly well, the only potential downside is that the deployment could be a bit complex for some users."
"The solution can have some compliance problems in general and the end-point user can bypass easily the company policies in Intune."
"It needs certificate provisioning for S/MIME purposes."
"There's quite a lot of development that they can do within their Intune dashboard. I think there are too many lines hyperlinked to move you around. Others, in contrast, give you a simple dashboard and an intuitive administrative walkthrough."
"Microsoft Intune could improve by being more user-friendly and having it geared toward device management. The graphic interface is not very good."
"No option to do end-to-en macOS management. Slow implementation of policies."
"The scalability could be improved, and like most other MDM products, Intune is good but not 100% there yet."
"The console needs improvement. It does not provide all the information that we are looking for as far as who has installed a certain product."
"The initial installation could be simplified."
"I would like more support for Google Chromebook operating system, so I could manage it."
"I would like to see better integration with our AD. Instead of having to use Active Directory groups, we'd like to use Active Directory attributes instead. There is a lot of overhead in managing. Whereas, if we could key on something tied to HR, or some other feed indicating who they are or what role they have, and manage them that way, that would be much preferable than having to manage people with Active Directory groups. Because, if people move roles, then we have to make sure that we move them from one Active Directory group to another, which is hands-on, a lot of overhead."
"The installations on the device could be simpler. It is a good solution, and all the features are there. So, there isn't a lot to improve. I'm sure they already have their thought process on how to improve it."
"From the past to the present, before mobility location, we frequently required a restart."
"Some users have complained that some features cannot be done through the BlackBerry Access Hub."
"Second level support needs to have strong knowledge of the product."
"I really feel like asset explorer should be a component of desktop central. That would make it the ultimate desktop management tool. This would also simplify the asset management role since an agent is already being deployed and assets could be added at the same time."
"The pricing could be a bit better."
"The support could be faster."
"ManageEngine Desktop Central is very limited. When you scan your system, it will only recognize Microsoft Windows Defender and BitLocker."
"The performance sometimes lags a bit because the solution is demanding on system resources."
"ManageEngine could be improved by giving customers an option to perform certain actions proactively. Since I was a consultant, I worked on different products and some had advantages over ManageEngine. For example, proactive remediation—you want to proactively check something on the computers and run the script. In ManageEngine, you have the option to run the script, but Intune has the option to do so proactively. ManageEngine doesn't have this. You should have the option to act proactively, not just going ahead and fixing it once it's done. Proactive remediation should be a feature."
"There is a slight delay in customer support, which is something that can be improved."
"The team I've currently got is not using it particularly well, due to the fact that they don't know how to use it particularly well. They've not done any training and so on."
More BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is ranked 17th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 24 reviews while ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 4th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 59 reviews. BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is rated 7.8, while ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite writes "Helpful technical support, and performs well, but initial setup could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, SOTI MobiControl and Ivanti Neurons for MDM, whereas ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.