We performed a comparison between ADONIS and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It is a stable solution."
"It's a very complete solution."
"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."
"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."
"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."
"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"
"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"It provides possibilities for us to save documents and supporting the business process while doing so."
"It is quite good."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"We like Documentum for its capacity and reliability."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"We primarily use it for storing documents. We host a variety of documents in OpenText Documentum. This includes raw files, analyzed files, and documents in multiple formats."
"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."
"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."
"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."
"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."
"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."
"When you update a page, the information on the quick links sidebar on the left side doesn't stay in the same place. It moves down, so you have to scroll to find it. That's not very user-friendly."
"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"The user interface can be improved."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
"Sometimes DocBroker cannot see the DocBase."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
ADONIS is ranked 17th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 7 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. ADONIS is rated 7.8, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ADONIS writes "A strong choice for business process modeling with an easy-to-use drag and drop approach". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". ADONIS is most compared with ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
