We performed a comparison between Atmos [EOL] and Box based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Nasuni, Google and others in Cloud Storage."This is a scalable solution that can handle petabytes of information and millions of stored objects at multiple locations."
"Sharing and collaborating across files and folders has been a massive game changer."
"The solution is scalable."
"The collaboration of the solution is good."
"File sharing, authorization on the back, its ease of use and reliable uptime performance are valuable features of this solution."
"The ability to collaborate around data anywhere, anytime is the most powerful features of Box."
"Box is very user-friendly; more so than SharePoint."
"Box is extremely stable, they have not been hacked or lost any data in the past seventeen years. I am very impressed with it."
"File sharing with collaborators not on the same domain with offline access from multiple devices: I work on many projects that are multi-organizational, such as with customers, suppliers, or acquisitions."
"Our clients need the flexibility to easily move from Atmos to AWS and GCP and then back from GCP to AWS to Atmos."
"Working on documents in real-time is sometimes faulty and could be improved."
"The search features and role permissions are not very user friendly. It only searches the first few pages of a document, which is quite a problem."
"I find their API to be quite complex and it could be more straightforward."
"It could be cheaper."
"With OneDrive, you can continuously save your files over a Box folder. That is something I wish we could have."
"I recommend doing the trial first, because it's not cheap ware. It's not overly expensive, but it's not cheap ware, and enterprise has a minimum number of users."
"I don't like the low level of role-based security it provides – it's very cumbersome, and the support is ordinary at times."
"They could integrate better with other platforms."
Earn 20 points
Atmos [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Storage while Box is ranked 8th in Cloud Storage with 37 reviews. Atmos [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Box is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atmos [EOL] writes "Flexible in deployment, scalable, and the technical support is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Box writes "Used for data storage and data collaboration, but its data security could be improved". Atmos [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Box is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Citrix ShareFile, Office 365 and Egnyte.
See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
