We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"Low code development."
"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."
"The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you."
"It integrates well with various servers."
"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."
"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."
"Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"The product must add more compatible connectors."
"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 46th in Business Process Management (BPM) while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration. See our Comindware Tracker vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
