We performed a comparison between Everest Blueriq and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"Two things are excellent in Documentum. One is business process management. The other is its support for metadata."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"We primarily use it for storing documents. We host a variety of documents in OpenText Documentum. This includes raw files, analyzed files, and documents in multiple formats."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"It is quite good."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
"The user interface can be improved."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
"We mostly use the Life Sciences package. That package is somewhat dated. There should be enhancements to the Life Science package and additional offerings to support pharma in particular."
Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
