We performed a comparison between ELMA 365 and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Salesforce and others in CRM."A lot of customers, when we introduce this kind of product into their organization, it provides a lot of analytics."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"The stability is good."
"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."
"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is its reliability. It has a lot of great documentation from the service providers. Additionally, it is easy to use."
"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."
"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."
"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."
"High throughput and excellent scalability."
"Customers want improved productivity."
"webMethods Integration Server could improve on the version control. I'm not sure if Web Method has some kind of inbuilt integration with Bitbucket or GitHub or some kind of version control system. However, that's one area where they can improve."
"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."
"The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern."
"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."
"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
ELMA 365 is ranked 67th in CRM with 1 review while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. ELMA 365 is rated 0.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ELMA 365 writes "A great ERP for medium and even small businesses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". ELMA 365 is most compared with Bitrix24, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.