We performed a comparison between Flowmon and ManageEngine OpManager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The solution is stable."
"The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce."
"It is an open platform, so in terms of integration, we are quite happy. We can integrate it with other SNMP solutions. We can also integrate it with security solutions, such as a SIEM solution."
"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine."
"The solution is finely stable."
"The dashboard, versatility and larger horizon are valuable."
"The solution gives pretty good network visibility. I am also impressed with it's monitoring."
"The traffic monitoring and the traffic analysis are great."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts. The administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately. This is the feature we value and use the most."
"Device monitoring is a good tool of this solution."
"The solution is easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage and monitor the environment. Instead of being reactive, it's proactive."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"It would be helpful to have more details about the monitoring of the infrastructure. It should have support for SNMP. This is something that is currently not there in the product."
"The licensing price could be better."
"If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good."
"The main area for improvement for ManageEngine OpManager is its performance."
"It is sometimes difficult to manage the user interface. It can get very complicated."
"The pricing of the solution is high. They should work to adjust the pricing model to see if they can help reduce costs."
"We encounter challenges in monitoring cloud services. I would also appreciate it if there was someone available to walk you through the documentation."
"The initial setup is a bit complicated. It needs a technician who is very aware of the flow and how to officially set up the flow chart, etc."
"We would like the solution's customize and build functionality to be more user-friendly."
"The storage level monitoring needs improvement. It needs storage level monitoring on the server itself. That feature is lacking right now."
"This product is little bit slow sometimes. It may be that we need to change the configuration to improve performance."
Flowmon is ranked 70th in Network Monitoring Software while ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 15th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews. Flowmon is rated 8.0, while ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Flowmon writes "A stable and scalable solution allowing for the visibility of and the blocking of threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". Flowmon is most compared with Darktrace, SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, WhatsUp Gold and PRTG Network Monitor, whereas ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, SCOM and NETSCOUT nGeniusONE.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.