We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiGate-VM and Juniper SRX Series Firewall based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Fortinet FortiGate-VM is highly regarded for its robust security features, including geofencing, IPS, antivirus, and a user-friendly interface. Additionally, it is praised for its strong firewall capabilities. Juniper SRX Series Firewall is appreciated for its ease of use and intuitive interface. It is also valued for its reliable support, site-to-site VPN functionality, and effective firewall protection.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has room for improvement in several areas including key activation, internal log management, cloud management, monitoring tools, hardening, availability, clustering, throughput, customization, pricing model, troubleshooting forum, and guidance. Juniper SRX Series Firewall requires improvements in capacity limitations, pricing strategy, reporting and alerts, user interface, device reliability, documentation, and feature enhancements.
Service and Support: The customer service for Fortinet FortiGate-VM has mixed feedback. Some customers appreciate the fast response and expertise of the support team, while others believe there is room for improvement. Customers generally express contentment with the customer service of Juniper SRX Series Firewall, finding the support to be valuable and prompt. Nonetheless, there have been occasions where response times were slower.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Fortinet FortiGate-VM is generally simple and user-friendly, with users noting its ease of deployment. The initial setup for Juniper SRX Series Firewall can be completed relatively quickly for small-scale branch offices yet may require more time for complex environments. While some users found it to be effortless and plug-and-play, others mentioned a learning curve and the necessity of CLI experience.
Pricing: The setup cost for Fortinet FortiGate-VM is flexible and reasonable, offering choices for yearly or monthly licenses. Juniper SRX Series Firewall is priced in the middle, with a generally straightforward setup cost.
ROI: Fortinet FortiGate-VM provides enhanced security and stability, resulting in a high ROI rating from users. It is crucial to select the appropriate size initially to ensure a favorable return on investment. Juniper SRX Series Firewall offers reliability, uptime, and advanced security features, leading to a positive ROI for users.
Comparison Results: Fortinet FortiGate-VM is the preferred choice over Juniper SRX Series Firewall. Customers appreciate Fortinet FortiGate-VM for its robust security features, user-friendly nature, effortless deployment, and intuitive interface. The product also stands out for its exceptional support provided during deployment.
"The usage in general is pretty good."
"Valuable features include the Web Application Firewall, and it even has DLP (data leak prevention)."
"The customization potential is quite impressive."
"It is easy to use and performs very well."
"The integration with Active Directory is one of the good features. Most of the customers are now looking for the Single Sign-on feature. So, being able to integrate Active Directory with the firewall is useful. It is also easy."
"Fortinet offers the latest versions to cater to the needs of enterprises."
"Their proxy-based inspection is responsive and secure."
"It enables our organization to become more productive. Also, it protects our NEtWare from viruses and malware."
"The most valuable features are the IPS and Antivirus."
"Fortinet FortiGate-VM is very easy to create the user of VPN, allowing them to use it quickly. Additionally, the integration and interface are good."
"I have worked on some of the largest and smallest solutions that Fortinet sells and they all scale really well."
"The solution is very secure, and its technical support is on point."
"High network throughput while providing leading edge network security technology for a competitive price."
"I did like the ability to back up the configuration into the cloud, as opposed to having to store the configurations or just downloading them, the backups, to local devices."
"We use it to ensure that our network is properly protected from viruses and malware."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to operate."
"One of Juniper SRX's most valuable features is the site-to-site VPN."
"The most valuable feature is the virtualization because it can be used for customers who are using the mobile data network to request a private connection to a remote site."
"It protects from distributed denial-of-service attacks with Screen Options."
"The command line in Juniper SRX is extremely powerful, in my opinion. It's one of the best command lines I've used in networking products."
"I like that Juniper SRX is easy to use, scalable, and stable with good performance."
"On a scale from one to ten, one being the worst and ten being the best I'd give Juniper SRX an overall rating of eight because of its' competitive price."
"The most valuable feature is robustness."
"From a protection perspective, it provides a network perimeter security function for our company."
"This product needs to have an analysis feature, rather than having the analysis done through the integration of a different product."
"They've become quite expensive."
"It's my understanding that more of the current generation features could be brought in. There could be more integration with EDRs, for example."
"Fortinet FortiGate could improve by having more storage in the hardware for log data."
"I would like to see improvements in the support from Fortinet. Here in the Philippines, whenever we have problems with a Fortinet product, we mostly ask for support from distributors and resellers and not directly from Fortinet."
"We would like to see an upgrade to the VPN feature, we are using the VPN from outside of our office and there is a limitation to 10 connections, more connections would be suitable."
"Improvement is needed in the Web Filter quotas to restrict users with allocated quotas."
"The feedback that I have received is that the performance could be better, and the user experience is not as good compared to a previous solution we used. It could be more user-friendly. Of course, it still works fine for our operations."
"Improvements are needed for the responsive UI and JIT traffic reporting."
"The tool is expensive."
"It would be better if it could provide you with options before completely blocking anything through the web filter. If you are doing a deep SSL inspection on the site if it says it's expired, it doesn't give you the option to continue at your own risk. I can't say that it's bad, but SSL internally isn't really a requirement. However, its security features can help. Right now, we have people going out and spending on purchasing the SSL certificates for internal sites."
"We have lost some information and we do not know how that happened through the solution. So that needs improvement."
"Fortinet could improve the availability and delivery of its products. It takes four to six weeks for every purchase to arrive."
"FortiGate-VM could be improved by making it cloud-based. I'd like it to be a cloud-based management solution instead of just a dedicated management orchestration tool."
"In terms of improvement, there have been some problems with the bandwidth of the security layer."
"They could simplify the troubleshooting process."
"The solution's configurations and syntax are specific and more complicated than other platforms."
"Third-party support for Juniper is a lot less than Cisco. This is no surprise, but a definite consideration if you are expecting to use a lot of third party support. In my guesstimate, for every 100 Cisco shops, you will find one Juniper shop."
"In comparison to other enterprise-level firewalls, such as Cisco FTD, Cisco has improved significantly. In the past, I believed that Juniper SRX was superior, but after seeing the advancements in the FTD platform, Cisco has better functionality. I have not recently explored Juniper SRX's next-generation firewall capabilities as we only use basic firewall filtering in our enterprise network."
"It's a good stable firewall, but it's nowhere near what it needs to be for a next-generation type firewall."
"The range of devices should be expanded to include those suitable for a small implementation. Juniper does not have any lower-priced SRX models, useful perhaps for a single ATM or a single bank branch."
"The web interface on Juniper SRX is just a short conversion from Junos OS CLI; this is not very suitable for users with little expertise/"
"When I was going to upgrade the OS, the solution didn't accept certain USB devices."
"The centralized management platform could be improved."
Fortinet FortiGate-VM is ranked 9th in Firewalls with 113 reviews while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is ranked 19th in Firewalls with 86 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate-VM is rated 8.4, while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate-VM writes "An easy-to-manage and configure tool that provides ample documentation to help with the setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper SRX Series Firewall writes "Highly scalable, user-friendly UI, and easy to maintain". Fortinet FortiGate-VM is most compared with Azure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks VM-Series, Fortinet FortiOS, OPNsense and Netgate pfSense, whereas Juniper SRX Series Firewall is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Netgate pfSense, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Check Point NGFW. See our Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Juniper SRX Series Firewall report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors and best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.