Compare Fortinet FortiMail vs. Proofpoint Email Protection

Fortinet FortiMail is ranked 2nd in Messaging Security with 11 reviews while Proofpoint Email Protection is ranked 3rd in Messaging Security with 1 review. Fortinet FortiMail is rated 8.8, while Proofpoint Email Protection is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiMail writes "User-friendly, multi-platform, easy to setup and troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Proofpoint Email Protection writes "Advanced protection allows us to remove messages before they are officially classified as bad". Fortinet FortiMail is most compared with Cisco Email Security (ESA), Barracuda Email Security Gateway and Proofpoint Email Protection, whereas Proofpoint Email Protection is most compared with Agari, Cisco Email Security (ESA) and Palo Alto Networks WildFire.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Proofpoint and others in Messaging Security. Updated: December 2019.
389,978 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
I think the spamming feature is very valuable.The most valuable feature of this solution is the spam filter.Technical support is great. They are able to look at their patches and offer quick responses. We even have an account manager in the Middle East. They are very good.Troubleshooting is very simple because you can see where the email was not delivered and why it would be considered as spam.Technical support is great. They're available 24/7 and their response time is typically within the hour.The solution is very reliable and very stable.A full-featured email gateway solution that contains security threats reliably.This excellent email gateway minimizes spam, inspects suspicious emails and isolates infected attachments with little administrative effort.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is the ability to remove bad messages that were delivered, prior to being classified as unwanted.

Read more »

Cons
Online support sometimes takes up to a week to get back to you.The only drawback to this solution is that the firmware is frequently updated, and each update results in downtime.There are features that other solutions have that this one is lacking, such as reporting options. I hope in future releases they advance their features list.An additional feature that could be added is a pop-up screen notifying you that an email has been blocked, without having to double click on it to take you there it could provide you with a summary explaining why it was on hold or why was it spam when you hover over it with your cursor.It would be nice if we could manage the solution from the cloud so I could handle things off-site if necessary.Limited ability to upgrade hardware may lead to some performance issues that might otherwise be improved.The product could incorporate even more artificial intelligence to enhance the functionality, but it is a competetive and intelligent product as it.The biggest room for improvement would be the deployment. It will be hard for someone who doesn't understand the interface to deploy. If you understand it, you can find your way around the problems.

Read more »

Proofpoint should have better integration with complex environments that need more than one instance of Proofpoint, as there are issues with nested instances.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
This is a good solution and value for the money.If you don't need the full bundle that includes everything, you have options for the small or medium enterprise environments.In the future I would like it if there's a possibility to lower the price of the bandwidth and UTM. It is quite expensive.Pricing is based on initial license purchase and use volume.Pricing is straight-forward and renewable without complicated pricing structures.The annual cost is $55,000.It is an expensive product.The licensing model for this solution is better because it is based on the box and not the number of users.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Messaging Security solutions are best for your needs.
389,978 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
out of 44 in Messaging Security
Views
4,620
Comparisons
3,448
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
667
Avg. Rating
8.8
3rd
out of 44 in Messaging Security
Views
7,530
Comparisons
6,105
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
125
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
FortiMailProofpoint Enterprise Protection
Learn
Fortinet
Proofpoint
Overview

FortiMail appliances and virtual appliances are proven, powerful email security platforms for any size organization — from small businesses to carriers, service providers, and large enterprises. Purpose-built for the most demanding messaging systems, FortiMail appliances employ Fortinet’s years of experience in protecting networks against spam, malware, and other message-borne threats.

Proofpoint Email Protection stops malware and non-malware threats such as impostor email (also known as email fraud). Deployed as a cloud service or on-premises, it provides granular filtering to control bulk "graymail" and other unwanted email. And business continuity capabilities keep email communications flowing, even when your email server fails.

Offer
Learn more about Fortinet FortiMail
Learn more about Proofpoint Email Protection
Sample Customers
Magromer Cueros y Pieles S.A.Blocket, University of Waterloo, Lincoln Memorial University, WellSpan Health, U-Haul, Carestream Health, Westinghouse
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company27%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government10%
Media Company9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Proofpoint and others in Messaging Security. Updated: December 2019.
389,978 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Messaging Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.