Compare Galvanize HighBond vs. RSA Archer

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Galvanize HighBond Logo
1,519 views|773 comparisons
RSA Archer Logo
6,807 views|5,071 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Galvanize HighBond? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about MEGA HOPEX vs. RSA Archer and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable part of the product is the ease-of-use and the opportunity to create custom security applications easily.
Top Answer: I am currently using an older version of the product so my installation is not current. There have already been two new versions of Archer released after the version I have. I use 6.5 and 6.6 and 6.7… more »
Top Answer: I am developing applications in Archer from RSA (Rivest, Shamir, and Adelman). It is quite easy to implement the application. You just configure the workflow, define the forms and how the data is… more »
Ranking
8th
out of 54 in GRC
Views
1,519
Comparisons
773
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
2nd
out of 54 in GRC
Views
6,807
Comparisons
5,071
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
1,212
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
Rsam GRC, HighBond, HighBond by Galvanize Archer
Learn
Galvanize
RSA
Overview
Your GRC program is unique to your organization - and Rsam thinks it should stay that way. We give you control over what modules you want to implement and in what order. Deploy an out-of-the-box, turnkey baseline configuration that addresses your most urgent use case within 30 days and iterate from there. With Rsam, you can also easily customize the baseline configuration to meet your own unique needs. Iterate each step of the way until you reach 100% of your requirements. This keeps your implementation manageable and moving forward.Archer adapt enterprise governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) products to your requirements, build applications, and integrate with other systems, control the audit lifecycle to enable improved governance of audit-related activities, data, and processes, reduce the risk of IT and business disruption, harmful operational events, and significant business crises and build an efficient, collaborative governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) program across IT, finance, operations, and legal.
Offer
Learn more about Galvanize HighBond
Learn more about RSA Archer
Sample Customers
CNA InsuranceT-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Government8%
Media Company7%
Comms Service Provider5%
Galvanize HighBond is ranked 8th in GRC while RSA Archer is ranked 2nd in GRC with 3 reviews. Galvanize HighBond is rated 0.0, while RSA Archer is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich feature set helps save time and effort, making us more efficient and saving us money". Galvanize HighBond is most compared with OneTrust Vendor Risk Management, Symantec Control Compliance Suite and Lockpath Keylight, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Telos Xacta IA Manager, SAP BusinessObjects GRC and ZenGRC.

See our list of best GRC vendors, best IT Governance vendors, and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.