Compare HPE System Management vs. ScienceLogic

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version.""The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work.""This is a good product and I recommend it.""I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."

More HPE System Management Pros »

"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."

More ScienceLogic Pros »

Cons
"Our customers would like to see the price lowered.""If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier.""The return on investment report is too difficult to understand.""I think that support integration could be improved."

More HPE System Management Cons »

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

More ScienceLogic Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent.""The price of this product is fair.""The license was included when we purchased the server."

More HPE System Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

More ScienceLogic Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible.
Top Answer: The license was included when we purchased the server.
Top Answer: I think that support integration could be improved.
Top Answer: It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers.
Top Answer: Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution.
Top Answer: It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with… more »
Ranking
15th
out of 32 in Server Monitoring
Views
295
Comparisons
208
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
334
Rating
8.3
11th
out of 32 in Server Monitoring
Views
6,141
Comparisons
4,513
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
325
Rating
10.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
System Management, Operations Center, HP System Management
Learn More
Overview
HP System Management, is a solution that consolidates and correlates fault and performance events across your entire physical and virtual IT infrastructure.

ScienceLogic is the global leader in hybrid IT monitoring for the network of everything. Over 25,000 global service providers, enterprises, and government organizations rely on ScienceLogic to significantly enhance IT efficiency, optimize operations, and ensure business continuity. ScienceLogic is the first monitoring solution to provide a comprehensive view of all IT components through a single pane of glass, whether they reside in a public cloud environment or on-premises. With over 1,500 dynamic management apps and custom dashboarding capabilities, we deliver the scale, resiliency, and automation needed to simplify the constantly evolving task of managing IT resources, services, and applications.

Offer
Learn more about HPE System Management
Learn more about ScienceLogic
Sample Customers
Infotec
Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider57%
Manufacturing Company14%
Transportation Company14%
Media Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business43%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise14%
REVIEWERS
Small Business28%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise41%
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, Artica Soluciones Tecnologicas and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HPE System Management is ranked 15th in Server Monitoring with 4 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 11th in Server Monitoring with 1 review. HPE System Management is rated 8.4, while ScienceLogic is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of HPE System Management writes "Good management and monitoring of servers and very good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "It is stable and very easy to configure". HPE System Management is most compared with Lenovo XClarity Controller, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with LogicMonitor, Dynatrace, Splunk, Datadog and SolarWinds NPM.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.