Compare IBM BPM vs. Kofax TotalAgility

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
36,511 views|23,801 comparisons
IBM BPM Logo
16,802 views|12,264 comparisons
Kofax TotalAgility Logo
1,421 views|908 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Use Kofax TotalAgility? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: February 2021.
464,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are using the open-source version of this solution.""Camunda is much cheaper.""I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cloud and license of the subscription model for IBM BPM can be complex. There are a lot of alternatives to choose from.""It should provide more flexibility to connect with external systems, and there should be in-built services that can be used to integrate with other systems quickly.""The price is quite inflated, and I think that our service contract is per year with monthly fees.""Its price is on the higher side, and it can be improved. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. There are no additional costs."

More IBM BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
464,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi dear knauf its pleasure to see you in a good position, you were always in the top of specialist. your advise and… more »
Top Answer: Hi Leandro, those two BPM's shouldn't be compared on the functional level. They are different type of solutions.… more »
Top Answer:  Camunda BPM can be used to automate entire retail applications starting from customer purchases to return or… more »
Top Answer: It’s independent from DBMS but it’s dependent on WebSphere application server
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Lombardi Edition, IBM Business Process Manager, IBM WebSphere Process Server
TotalAgility, Singularity, Capture Enabled BPM
Learn More
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation
IBM Business Process Manager is a comprehensive BPM platform giving you visibility and insight to manage business processes. It scales smoothly and easily from an initial project to a full enterprise-wide program harnesses complexity in a simple environment to better meet customer needs.
Business process management and collaboration platform that empowers you to build and optimize business processes.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about IBM BPM
Learn more about Kofax TotalAgility
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, Accruent
Barclays, EmeriCon, Banca Popolare di Milano, CST Consulting, KeyBank, KPMG, Prolifics, Sandhata Technologies Ltd., State of Alaska, Humana S.A., Saperion, esciris, Banco Espirito Santo
AETNA, American Express, BNP Paribas, Citi, CommerzBank, Dexia, GoldmanSachs, HSBC, ING, JP Morgan, Raymond James
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm27%
Comms Service Provider20%
Non Profit13%
Government13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm65%
Insurance Company19%
Non Tech Company3%
Healthcare Company3%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm16%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm10%
Insurance Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business48%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise29%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise61%
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise70%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise63%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: February 2021.
464,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM BPM is ranked 6th in Business Process Management with 17 reviews while Kofax TotalAgility is ranked 7th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP). IBM BPM is rated 7.6, while Kofax TotalAgility is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers lots of space, quite stable, and perfect for large enterprises". On the other hand, IBM BPM is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow, Pega BPM, Apache Airflow, ARIS BPM and Appian, whereas Kofax TotalAgility is most compared with IBM Datacap, ABBYY FlexiCapture, Pega BPM, Newgen OmniFlow and HyperScience.

See our list of .

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.