We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and Oracle BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It gives us the ability to create toolkits and use them across many different applications. It allows us to write things one time, instead of having to write a diary for every single different application. We can write at once and reuse it."
"It has had a positive effect on decision-making in my organization. It helps us with our dispute process."
"It provides a solution for integration orchestration. This solution is for any organization in the banking, telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing, and all domains and industries."
"It has integrated UI and deployment models, and it has a deep set of consultant and service provider ecosystem features."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is stable because the different infrastructure elements, such as the OS and middleware have been used for a long time."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow provides a seamless streamlined collaboration within the organizations."
"It helps develop applications very quickly. Once clients get used to it and familiar with the methodology, then they don't feel so locked in. It is able to add this element of agility to our clients' software development lifecycle. That is my favorite thing about it: You're not so locked in as you used to be when developing applications."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the fact it is highly configurable. We can do configurations very easily."
"It has developmental accelerators, which allow for virtually any customization needs which you may require."
"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."
"We selected this solution not only for the BPM but for the entire package."
"The support is good."
"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."
"It is easy and cheap."
"One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles."
"The benefit from the tool is we can develop it quickly and easily use it for middleware services. We can publish the services so other applications can consume them. This is providing us some reusability and a type of security."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow could improve the integration."
"I would definitely like to see a unified interface between the BPM side of the house and the case side of the house. Something that just seems a bit more cohesive, because right now there is sort of a disconnect between the BPM and the case side of the house. That makes it a bit of a hard sell sometimes. That is definitely first and foremost on my wish list."
"The setup and installation process could be made easier."
"In terms of improvement, it could be less complex."
"The main improvement would be to make it easier to implement and deploy so that customers can kick it off and run quickly."
"The UI of the solution is not good. They should work to update the solution and make it better and fresher."
"The main areas which need improvement are specifically around reporting and analytics."
"From what I understand, in the next release they're actually going to combine all of this together as one integrated solution... If we could have one unified way to build a solution, that would really help."
"Oracle BPM could probably be improved with respect to the cost. When you are using this product, it'll be a bit costlier for the ROA. I think they should do some discounts on these products, especially for the licenses."
"The time it takes to get from deployment to production could be faster."
"The product must reduce its cost."
"Existing APIs in the product need to be fine-tuned, made more robust and flexible for adoption."
"You have to maintain it manually."
"The solution needs to offer better integration with third-party systems."
"It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy."
"Pricing is an area that could use improvement."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Oracle BPM is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews. IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, AWS Step Functions and IBM Case Foundation, whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda, SAP Signavio Process Manager, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions and Apache Airflow. See our IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. Oracle BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
