Hyland Perceptive Content vs IBM ECM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hyland Logo
176 views|133 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
880 views|761 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hyland Perceptive Content and IBM ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Document Management Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Reach out to local IBM partners.​"
  • More IBM ECM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Document Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration on-site. You can integrate with other components and applications like SAP… more »
    Top Answer:The product is expensive and has a perpetual license.
    Top Answer:The development platform is not local. For example, you need 100 days in IBM, whereas other platforms, like ServiceNow, need only 20 days.
    Ranking
    Views
    176
    Comparisons
    133
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    880
    Comparisons
    761
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    348
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ImageNow
    Learn More
    Hyland
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Perceptive Content is a scalable content services platform that manages the entire content lifecycle, from capture to disposition. Flexible functionality across multiple business applications, integration with virtually any business application and a simple-to-use interface help Perceptive Content transform internal processes and the customer experience. Perceptive Content helps users work smarter by surfacing content in context with other relevant business information. Digital documents can be viewed simultaneously, which promotes enhanced collaboration and communication among employees, customers and vendors. Locating relevant documents in the context of a business process increases customer satisfaction and employee productivity. Automated lifecycle management helps organizations comply with their records and retention policies, which reduces the risk of compliance violations and resulting fees and fines.

    IBM Content Foundation on Cloud

    IBM Content Foundation on Cloud allows organizations to deliver extensive enterprise content management capabilities to their users very quickly. IBM Content Foundation is powered by the FileNet content and process platform and IBM Content Navigator user experience. This cloud offering can be leveraged for a variety of use cases including collaborative document management, imaging solutions, social content management, archiving, and more. It also offers a platform for developing Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solutions in the cloud.


     IBM Case Manager on Cloud

    IBM Case Manager on Cloud is a solution platform that engages people with business content, provides contextual insight through real-time analytics, and enhances teamwork through collaboration tools and flexible workflow. Enables Business and IT to work together to create solutions across the enterprise that enables an organization to make smarter decisions for better business outcomes, while balancing the need for security and compliance in a world of heightened risk.

                                   

    Sample Customers
    KeyBank, Standard Chartered Bank, Union Bank, Sistema Tecnol‹gico de Monterrey, Illinois Department of Human Services, UnitedHealth Group
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    University19%
    Government18%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm53%
    Insurance Company20%
    Religious Institution7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company10%
    Government10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business6%
    Large Enterprise94%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Document Management Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hyland Perceptive Content is ranked 12th in Document Management Software while IBM ECM is ranked 13th in Enterprise Content Management with 16 reviews. Hyland Perceptive Content is rated 6.6, while IBM ECM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Hyland Perceptive Content writes "With workflows, a group of people can be working on appeals and forward them all to one queue". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM ECM writes "Datacap provides granularity and any level of customization. Solution development and delivery time needs to be improved". Hyland Perceptive Content is most compared with Hyland OnBase, Box, Alfresco and SharePoint, whereas IBM ECM is most compared with IBM FileNet, Mobius Content Services Platform, OpenText Documentum, SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management and Alfresco.

    We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.