IBM Rational ALM vs Micro Focus ALM

IBM Rational ALM is ranked 12th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 1 review vs Micro Focus ALM which is ranked 2nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 50 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational ALM writes "Rich planning features including Sprint, Sprint retrospective, and rules in Scrum framework". The top reviewer of Micro Focus ALM writes "Provides QA management and project management - testing, defect management, and reporting". IBM Rational ALM is most compared with JIRA, Micro Focus ALM and TFS. Micro Focus ALM is most compared with JIRA, TFS and CA Agile Central.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Micro Focus, CA Technologies and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
288,256 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Rational ALM vs Micro Focus ALM

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The planning feature is rich with Scrum concepts: Sprint, Sprint retrospective, the rules in the Scrum framework.

Read more »

The ability to integrate this solution with other applications is helpful. If there is automation, it comes with improved quality and speed.This solution is open and very easy to integrate. The interface is good too.It provides visibility on release status and readiness.It allows us to easily make linkage and dependencies, with plenty of integrations.Lab Management is a valuable feature, because you have a 360 view.As a system administrator, HPE ALM can be flexibly configured so that it can accommodate a variety of defined project lifecycles and test methodologies.Quality management, project management from a QA perspective - testing, defect management, how testing relates back to requirements.It's basically the way to show the work that we do as QA testers, and to have a historical view of those executions.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see better reporting features. The out-of-box reporting is - I don't want to say limited - but the focus is on the Scrum and Sprint reports. We need more reporting features regarding the history of the work, tracking it more deeply.

Read more »

There needs to be improvement in the requirement samples. At the moment, they are very basic.It needs Pure-FTPd WebUI and single sign-on.The QA needs improvement.HPE ALM’s out-of-the-box reporting can be perceived as rigid and limited, to an extent.I'd like to see the concept of teams put into it.I'd like to be able to improve how our QA department uses the tool, by getting better educational resources, documentation to help with competencies for my testers.It's not intuitive in that way, which has always been a problem, especially with business users.Client-side ActiveX with patch upgrades

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Seat and concurrent licensing models exist; the latter is recommended if a large number of different users will be utilizing the product.If you have more than five users, a concurrent licensing model should be considered.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
288,256 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
1,747
Comparisons
1,187
Reviews
1
Followers
288
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
37,878
Comparisons
14,577
Reviews
52
Followers
2,059
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
See more IBM Rational ALM competitors »
Compared 54% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
See more Micro Focus ALM competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsRational ALM, MKSHPE ALM
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
Micro Focus
Overview
OverviewLifecycle management capabilities built on the open, unifying IBM Rational Jazz platform can help agile and traditional teams: see at-a-glance status, access better data for decisions, manage costs, reuse the most efficient processes across the organization, manage cloud, web, SOA and mobile application design and development. Teams can also gain real-time traceability, manage work across vendors, unify across a diverse set of lifecyle tools, and provide collaborative development for continuous delivery as part of the IBM DevOps solution.

Micro Focus Application Lifecycle Management software (ALM), is a unified platform that helps teams prioritize, align and focus their project activities, provides actionable insight, and fosters the re-use of assets from requirements through development, testing, and readiness for delivery. 

Built on best practices, an extensible architecture and centralized repository, Micro Focus ALM is one of the first unified, technology-agnostic application management systems available now; integrating out-of-the-box with over 30 open source and competitive industry products.

Micro Focus’s ALM suite provides flexible solutions and deployment options to meet your needs and scale with you as you grow.

OFFER
Learn more about IBM Rational ALM
Learn more about Micro Focus ALM
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersTennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, AshurstSpecsavers, Cardinal Health, KMD, Turkcell
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
23%
Pharma/Biotech Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
35%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Insurance Company
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
11%
Midsize Enterprise
11%
Large Enterprise
78%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
7%
Midsize Enterprise
9%
Large Enterprise
84%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Micro Focus, CA Technologies and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
Download now
288,256 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email