IBM Rational ALM vs JIRA

IBM Rational ALM is ranked 12th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 1 review vs JIRA which is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 23 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational ALM writes "Rich planning features including Sprint, Sprint retrospective, and rules in Scrum framework". The top reviewer of JIRA writes "Using this for backlog prioritization is the key to either kanban or scrum processes". IBM Rational ALM is most compared with JIRA, Micro Focus ALM and TFS. JIRA is most compared with TFS, Micro Focus ALM and IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM).
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Micro Focus, CA Technologies and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
288,073 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Rational ALM vs JIRA

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The planning feature is rich with Scrum concepts: Sprint, Sprint retrospective, the rules in the Scrum framework.

Read more »

Reporting: It gives a nice report of my backlog and what my team has currently spent its efforts on.It benefits us because we have globally located teams. Our team members work in different geographies, so the product is a better way to manage progress and see the status of different tasksWe can cope with processes easily without adapting the tool, but adapting the tool to processes.The ability to change and rewrite tasks is valuable. You can add a lot of columns, change the owners and the change the components.JQL, JIRA Query Language enables me to filter all the issues, display the items as I want.It's very flexible. I can define workflows and custom fields and dependencies between issues and projects. And every project can have a custom configuration with my fields, my names for fields, my validations, and my workflows. It's very customizable.I found it super useful, as it is customizable for different teams and users.It improved communication, as it was a popular tool, and most people enjoyed using it.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see better reporting features. The out-of-box reporting is - I don't want to say limited - but the focus is on the Scrum and Sprint reports. We need more reporting features regarding the history of the work, tracking it more deeply.

Read more »

JIRA still has their own backtracking tools. It should have a better visibility into HPE UFT. Most people use functional testing tools, like QTP. They need to improve their integration to make it seamless.There is a difficulty viewing all the attachments because they are shown in one place. I would like attachments to be shown at the comment level.Sometimes, it is slow and hangs. We faced some stability issues where JIRA was down for a day. Also, we have lost some of our comments made in the JIRA because of downtime.There are no fields to search or to filter by, mainly the ones which use a data around a date and time when something changes.I would like to see it connecting to Git. That could be useful. We use it for Stash, but I think there is one for Git also. I don't know if it's a plug-in that exists already, but that could be nice.The following definitely need improvement: UI, speed, and mobile app functionality.Out-of-the-box reporting is limited. It would be helpful if more customisation was possible.​I would like integrated requirements management, so we do not have to buy plug-ins for JIRA, since it was hard to get requirements management for it.​

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
I understand JIRA is quite expensive.It does not cost that much.Almost everybody uses JIRA nowadays because it is the most cost-effective solution.The licensing model is annoying. They nickel and dime you.It is very cheap if you forego the local instance and stick to the cloud.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
288,073 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
1,747
Comparisons
1,187
Reviews
1
Followers
288
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
67,454
Comparisons
43,854
Reviews
21
Followers
1,822
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
See more IBM Rational ALM competitors »
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
See more JIRA competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsRational ALM, MKS
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
Atlassian
Overview
OverviewLifecycle management capabilities built on the open, unifying IBM Rational Jazz platform can help agile and traditional teams: see at-a-glance status, access better data for decisions, manage costs, reuse the most efficient processes across the organization, manage cloud, web, SOA and mobile application design and development. Teams can also gain real-time traceability, manage work across vendors, unify across a diverse set of lifecyle tools, and provide collaborative development for continuous delivery as part of the IBM DevOps solution.

JIRA has multiple deployment options to provide the flexibility your organization needs.

Cloud is a fully hosted service for customers who want to iterate quickly and have us take care of managing the infrastructure.

For customers who need to run our applications behind their firewall, we have Server and Data Center options. Server delivers greater capacity for a larger user base and gives you more control, allowing you to remain compliant with your enterprise IT, security, IP and privacy policies. For our largest customers, Data Center provides all the capability of our Server option, along with high availability, instant scalability and performance at scale.

Atlassian also offers premium support and strategic services for enterprise customers. Technical Account Managers are cross-functional technical advisors providing proactive planning and strategic guidance across your organization. Premier Support goes above and beyond our standard offerings to give you account-wide support from a team of senior support engineers.

OFFER
Learn more about IBM Rational ALM
Learn more about JIRA
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersTennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, AshurstSquare, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company
16%
Software R&D Company
16%
Insurance Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
Insurance Company
6%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
33%
Midsize Enterprise
16%
Large Enterprise
51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
21%
Midsize Enterprise
18%
Large Enterprise
61%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Micro Focus, CA Technologies and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
Download now
288,073 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email