IBM Rational ALM Logo

IBM Rational ALM pros and cons

Vendor: IBM
3.6 out of 5
1,147 followers
Post review
 

IBM Rational ALM Pros review quotes

LG
Sep 8, 2019
It is relatively easy to use and user-friendly once the setup is complete.
NK
Oct 1, 2019
At the same time, if you're working from the architect or the designing team you, it's quite easy to manage the resources online.
Manoj Sajjan - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 3, 2023
I would rate the stability of this product a nine out of ten.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Microsoft and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
EF
Feb 10, 2022
The integration with Git works well.
AH
Aug 13, 2020
You can customize the board according to your needs.
AK
Jan 5, 2020
The most valuable feature is the reporting of the CPU usage on the dashboard.
MR
Feb 16, 2024
The solution is customizable.
AH
Jun 12, 2018
The planning feature is rich with Scrum concepts: Sprint, Sprint retrospective, the rules in the Scrum framework.
RA
Dec 2, 2022
One of the key advantages of IBM Rational ALM is its workflow capabilities, which enable seamless collaboration between development and production teams and ensure that all stakeholders are aware of the progress and readiness of the solution. Additionally, the solution is good for integration.
RP
Sep 12, 2022
IBM Rational ALM is a very good tool. I like the management and traceability features and the test management tool. The latter is not linked with the stories and fixed management. It is really useful, and we can create test plans. We can also test some metrics related to QA.
 

IBM Rational ALM Cons review quotes

LG
Sep 8, 2019
There is not enough beginner support material in the form of FAQs or simple training to help you get started.
NK
Oct 1, 2019
The directory designer manager is uncivil. The design manager is clearly really unstable.
Manoj Sajjan - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 3, 2023
Some improvements to the user interface (UI) would be helpful, such as exposing more services to make it easier to customize to the needs of each customer.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Microsoft and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
EF
Feb 10, 2022
One of the complaints from users is that they have to click buttons too many times for just a simple task. Changing this would lead to a better user experience.
AH
Aug 13, 2020
The reporting functionality needs to be improved.
AK
Jan 5, 2020
The stability of this solution can be improved.
MR
Feb 16, 2024
The GUI is a little bit outdated.
AH
Jun 12, 2018
I would like to see better reporting features. The out-of-box reporting is - I don't want to say limited - but the focus is on the Scrum and Sprint reports. We need more reporting features regarding the history of the work, tracking it more deeply.
RA
Dec 2, 2022
The solution can improve in the development area and the customized applications.
RP
Sep 12, 2022
In the next release, we expect a traceability metrics configuration where we can configure the user stories. We also expect them to improve or simplify the query process.