We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud Data Integration and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is straightforward."
"The program is stable and scalable."
"The solution provides increased efficiency while still being user-friendly and easy to operate."
"It is one of the best tools available for data integration."
"The features I find most valuable is the synchronization, verification, functionalities and all the data integration features."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."
"The most valuable feature is the building of mockups and tasks."
"The mass ingestion functionality and the elasticity of the solution are great."
"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."
"The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good."
"Currently, we're using this solution for the integration server which helps us to integrate with the mainframe."
"We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces."
"The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast."
"It is a very stable product."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"It integrates well with various servers."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration could improve the price by making it less expensive."
"Certain applications are not being synced with the ION."
"There is room for improvement at the highest level in terms of useability and connectors for various types of new applications. The row processing performance could be better because you experience some latency dealing with high volumes of data. Most organizations will be dealing with multiple cloud applications, so you could see performance issues moving from one system to another."
"Cost-wise, it could be better."
"Its features for partitioning and optimization could be better."
"The vendor should have more training resources: online classes, free tutorial videos, etc."
"A general improvement in icons and the virtual interface would be good."
"The main issue preventing Brazilian companies from migrating to Informatica Cloud Data Integration from on-prem is the price."
"It is quite expensive."
"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."
"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."
"The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration. See our Informatica Cloud Data Integration vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.