We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."
"Easy integration with Salesforce"
"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."
"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"API management."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations."
"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
"Its API management capabilities need improvement."
"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."
"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"The stability could be better."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"It should give better control over account management."
Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 22nd in Workload Automation with 13 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 8th in Workload Automation with 40 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SnapLogic and TIBCO Scribe, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors, best Cloud Data Integration vendors, and best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
