Compare LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA vs. One Identity Safeguard
LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA is ranked 15th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 1 review while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 4th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 13 reviews. LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA is rated 6.0, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA writes "A solution with a good interface and great reporting features but in need of better technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Improved our security posture by making password changes easy and allowing us to make regular password changes to service accounts". LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Stealthwatch and Splunk User Behavior Analytics, whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk PAS, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Fudo PAM.
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Securonix Solutions, Rapid7 and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: March 2020. 405,734 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
The solution's most valuable features are the graphical user interface and the reporting. | It's one of the best products we've seen. When you start looking at the functionality and use cases and usability of the product, it's straightforward. They designed this product with the end-user in mind, and they also had the sysadmin who is supporting the product in mind. They really did a nice job. Overall, it's a nice product to work with. We are able to log and get reporting on all privileged activity that is being performed. We like the fact that we can leverage the session recording feature, which is especially valuable when we're dealing with third-party vendors that have to remote into our our boxes and servers to do any work on behalf of the bank. Now, we can record everything they are doing to ensure that they're only doing the changes that were needed. In addition, we use it to leverage knowledge transfer with our internal staff. We use the solution’s “transparent mode” feature for privileged sessions. It is very easy because it is only a simple configuration for our users. We don't have to modify our network. We install it, configure it, and it works. So, it is super easy. The rollout for our users is seamless. It has greatly helped improve our security posture. Safeguard has an option where it will reset passwords on service accounts, then go out to those servers where that service account is running as a service and update the password on it. That makes password changes very easy. We can regularly change passwords now and are planning on making it an annual activity, where all the people who own service accounts will go in and make sure all their passwords get changed, updated, and reset. All sessions are audited and they are indexed/searchable through the GUI. The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording. The way the solution is installed and deployed is very valuable. They make it very easy. The most unique and valuable features are the upstream and downstream throughput capacities; the Safeguard platform provides agile integration. In actuality, all the features are valuable. They're good, user-friendly. |
Cons | |
The search feature needs to be improved. | From a usability perspective, what we are finding out is that our privileged domain admin users, in particular, want functionality for extending a checkout session. So we are working with One Identity support to see if there's an enhancement that can be made to the product. Some of the out-of-the-box reporting isn't that rich. We spoke to our Safeguard reps who have acknowledged that some of the reporting features can certainly be improved and that we're not the only customer who has cited this. There are very little out-of-the-box reporting capabilities. You have to build the queries and the report. I believe in the next release they're going to be addressing this. The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0. Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature. Monitoring of the platform should be easier and more functional so that you can have a clear picture of the running service. I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated. Our experience with technical support has been disappointing. We require more prompt and faster response times. We require answers to our questions right away but we haven't received that level of support. On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated. Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis. It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody. The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible. Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs. 405,734 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 1,444 Comparisons 1,132 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 200 Avg. Rating 6.0 | Views 2,720 Comparisons 1,220 Reviews 11 Average Words per Review 655 Avg. Rating 8.3 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 38% of the time.  Compared 17% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time. |  Compared 50% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| LogRhythm CloudAI, LogRhythm UEBA | |
Learn | |
| LogRhythm | One Identity |
Overview | |
LogRhythm UEBA enables your security team to quickly and effectively detect, respond to, and neutralize both known and unknown threats. Providing evidence-based starting points for investigation, it employs a combination of scenario analytics techniques (e.g., statistical analysis, rate analysis, trend analysis, advanced correlation), and both supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML). | One Identity Safeguard securely stores, manages, records and analyzes privileged accounts and access. It is an integrated solution that combines a secure hardened password safe and a session management and monitoring solution with threat detection and analytics. |
Offer | |
Learn more about LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA | Securely store, manage, record and analyze privileged access Prevent security breaches and limit damage by putting in place a privileged access management solution. Get a free 45-day trial, or request a demo of One Identity SafeGuard. |
Sample Customers | |
| Cavium | |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Financial Services Firm71% University14% Manufacturing Company14% Software R&D Company32% Financial Services Firm21% Comms Service Provider16% Construction Company6% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Securonix Solutions, Rapid7 and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: March 2020.
405,734 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA Reviews, One Identity Safeguard Reviews, and our list of Best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA Companies.
We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.