Compare Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional vs. RadView WebLOAD

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional vs. RadView WebLOAD and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The initial setup and installation of the software were very easy and straightforward.""The solution is quite stable.""The load testing, reporting, and scripting features are all valuable features.""I like the user interface. I like the way we can divide our scenarios and can tune them. The integration with the quality center is great. These features are really good.""I think that analytics is very good and that the analytics features are very powerful.""The reporting mechanism is a valuable feature that generates good reports.""The most useful aspect of the solution is that it provides agents in different geographic locations.""It has good protocol coverage."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional Pros »

"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting.""The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."

More RadView WebLOAD Pros »

Cons
"Sometimes we are not be able to click on some of the buttons due to the screen mismatching and compatibility issues.""I guess scalability becomes a problem when you use things like TruClients.""The solution needs to reduce its pricing. Right now, it's quite expensive.""The solution uses a lot of memory and then it dies. It's difficult to work with the solution sometimes when you run a scenario it dies. They need to make the solution lighter somehow.""I would like to have better support for adding more users per load generator.""The debugging capability should be improved.""The solution is very costly. The cost is very high, especially considering a lot of other resources are available now and they are less expensive. For a small organization, it is very difficult to sustain the costs involved in having the solution or the related fees""The product is not stable and reliable in the version we are currently using."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional Cons »

"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved.""The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."

More RadView WebLOAD Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The licensing fees are based on the number of users.""It is competing with other products that may cost significantly less or may be available as open-source. Because of that it is relatively expensive.""LoadRunner Professional is an expensive product.""This is not a cheap product.""There is a licensing cost that is expensive."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We purchased a license for two years.""It costs $8,600 yearly and we have the Cloud, which is an additional $800. Our perpetual license is $800 and then the Cloud functionality with our 500 users is the $8,600."

More RadView WebLOAD Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
534,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution can handle a huge amount of workloads, it's quite scalable.
Top Answer: There is a licensing cost that is expensive. There is also the Enterprise version of the software which allows other features that the Professional does not, such as, license sharing.
Top Answer: My team members predominately used the product to do development but I don't think it needs anything in a way of improvements.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
12,960
Comparisons
9,510
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
449
Rating
7.9
13th
Views
2,038
Comparisons
997
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
597
Rating
5.5
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner
Learn More
Radview
Video Not Available
Overview

LoadRunner is the Micro Focus industry-standard software solution for application performance and load testing. LoadRunner stresses your entire system to isolate and identify potential client, network, and server bottlenecks, supporting performance testing of new technologies together with your existing, legacy applications.

WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional
Learn more about RadView WebLOAD
Sample Customers
JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media
GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm28%
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider12%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm57%
Healthcare Company29%
University14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm9%
Healthcare Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise87%
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Large Enterprise90%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional vs. RadView WebLOAD and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is ranked 2nd in Performance Testing Tools with 12 reviews while RadView WebLOAD is ranked 13th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is rated 8.0, while RadView WebLOAD is rated 5.6. The top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional writes "Very good controller and a market leader, but not cost effective for small business". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code ". Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Neotys NeoLoad, Apache JMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, whereas RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Apache JMeter, Neotys NeoLoad, BlazeMeter, Visual Studio Test Professional and Selenium HQ. See our Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional vs. RadView WebLOAD report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.