Compare Apache JMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD
Apache JMeter is ranked 2nd in Performance Testing Tools with 10 reviews while RadView WebLOAD is ranked 12th in Performance Testing Tools with 1 review. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while RadView WebLOAD is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Good reports and analysis capabilities with a quick initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code ". Apache JMeter is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Postman and BlazeMeter, whereas RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Neotys NeoLoad.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| Use RadView WebLOAD? Share your opinion. | ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Broadcom and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: February 2020. 398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
When there's a high number of TPS I can achieve more transactions per seconds given the hyper-limitations. The most valuable features are the integration with Jenkins and the reporting. The reports and analysis tools are very good. They are the solution's most valuable features. The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good. JMeter is easy to use for a user who doesn't have too much knowledge of programming or certain languages. The most valuable feature for us is the available information on the forums and to be able to discuss and get answers from the people that are involved in using this tool. The ease of use is the solution's most valuable feature. Also, the ability to easily create test cases is also very good. It's easy to just ramp up on the solution. API testing, Database Testing, and MQ testing can be done with ease. | The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting. |
Cons | |
JMeter output reports can be difficult to understand without training. The interface could be made more user-friendly. It's not easy to get the data from one place or to do customizations. Automation is difficult in JMeter. Considering the kinds of tests we are performing here, where we launch several tests at the same time as a batch request, JMeter is not the best tool for the job. Those kinds of things could be done easily with other tools, like T6. There is some work to be done with the integration. In future releases, it would be helpful if there was an integration with ALM Octane. The tool should be made a bit more robust, and better support should be made available. | Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
This is an open-source product. This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees. I switched to Apache because it is free. Other tools are much too expensive and can cost up to $50,000 a year if you are looking at commercial options. Free | We purchased a license for two years. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs. 398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 11,579 Comparisons 9,994 Reviews 6 Average Words per Review 398 Avg. Rating 8.2 | Views 1,617 Comparisons 944 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 543 Avg. Rating 6.0 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time. |  Compared 32% of the time. Compared 26% of the time.  Compared 21% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| JMeter | |
Learn | |
| Apache | Radview Video Not Available |
Overview | |
Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types. | WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.
|
Offer | |
Learn more about Apache JMeter | Learn more about RadView WebLOAD |
Sample Customers | |
| AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape | GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board. |
Top Industries | |
Financial Services Firm36% Software R&D Company27% Hospitality Company9% Healthcare Company9% Software R&D Company49% Comms Service Provider13% Retailer5% Financial Services Firm4% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Broadcom and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: February 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Apache JMeter Reviews, RadView WebLOAD Reviews, and our list of Best Performance Testing Tools Companies.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.