Apache JMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD Comparison

Pros
The most valuable feature for us is the available information on the forums and to be able to discuss and get answers from the people that are involved in using this tool.The ease of use is the solution's most valuable feature. Also, the ability to easily create test cases is also very good. It's easy to just ramp up on the solution.API testing, Database Testing, and MQ testing can be done with ease.The solution offers a lot of plug-ins and a huge continuously developing community that is regularly offering new features and plug-ins.The solution is free. You don't need to worry about licensing costs. Read more »	The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting. Read more »
Cons
There is some work to be done with the integration.In future releases, it would be helpful if there was an integration with ALM Octane.The tool should be made a bit more robust, and better support should be made available.The solution could use some sort of educational features to offer tips and hints to help users navigate it better. They should improve the manuals and help files.The user interface is a little bit tricky. Read more »	Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved. Read more »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 376,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd out of 28 in Performance Testing Tools Views 10,951 Comparisons 9,482 Reviews 5 Average Words per Review 367 Avg. Rating 8.2	11th out of 28 in Performance Testing Tools Views 1,639 Comparisons 952 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 543 Avg. Rating 6.0
Top Comparisons
LoadRunner vs. Apache JMeter Compared 15% of the time. BlazeMeter vs. Apache JMeter Compared 12% of the time. LoadUI Pro vs. Apache JMeter Compared 10% of the time. See more Apache JMeter competitors » + Add more products to compare	Apache JMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD Compared 30% of the time. LoadRunner vs. RadView WebLOAD Compared 25% of the time. Neotys NeoLoad vs. RadView WebLOAD Compared 24% of the time. See more RadView WebLOAD competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
JMeter
Learn
Apache	Radview Video Not Available
Overview
Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.	WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.
Offer
Learn more about Apache JMeter Learn More	Learn more about RadView WebLOAD Learn More
Sample Customers
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape	GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS Software R&D Company48% Comms Service Provider11% Retailer5% Government5%	No Data Available

Pricing and Cost Advice
This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.I switched to Apache because it is free. Other tools are much too expensive and can cost up to $50,000 a year if you are looking at commercial options.Free Read more »	We purchased a license for two years. Read more »

Compare Apache JMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD