Compare Apache JMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache JMeter Logo
15,009 views|12,504 comparisons
RadView WebLOAD Logo
1,791 views|1,019 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is free. You don't need to worry about licensing costs.""The solution offers a lot of plug-ins and a huge continuously developing community that is regularly offering new features and plug-ins.""API testing, Database Testing, and MQ testing can be done with ease.""The ease of use is the solution's most valuable feature. Also, the ability to easily create test cases is also very good. It's easy to just ramp up on the solution.""The most valuable feature for us is the available information on the forums and to be able to discuss and get answers from the people that are involved in using this tool.""JMeter is easy to use for a user who doesn't have too much knowledge of programming or certain languages.""The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good.""The most valuable features are the integration with Jenkins and the reporting."

More Apache JMeter Pros »

"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting.""The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."

More RadView WebLOAD Pros »

Cons
"The user interface is a little bit tricky.""The solution could use some sort of educational features to offer tips and hints to help users navigate it better. They should improve the manuals and help files.""The tool should be made a bit more robust, and better support should be made available.""In future releases, it would be helpful if there was an integration with ALM Octane.""There is some work to be done with the integration.""Considering the kinds of tests we are performing here, where we launch several tests at the same time as a batch request, JMeter is not the best tool for the job. Those kinds of things could be done easily with other tools, like T6.""Automation is difficult in JMeter.""The interface could be made more user-friendly."

More Apache JMeter Cons »

"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved.""The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."

More RadView WebLOAD Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Free""I switched to Apache because it is free. Other tools are much too expensive and can cost up to $50,000 a year if you are looking at commercial options.""This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.""This is an open-source product.""I was using the free version of the software.""In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free."

More Apache JMeter Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We purchased a license for two years.""It costs $8,600 yearly and we have the Cloud, which is an additional $800. Our perpetual license is $800 and then the Cloud functionality with our 500 users is the $8,600."

More RadView WebLOAD Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: When there's a high number of TPS I can achieve more transactions per seconds given the hyper-limitations.
Top Answer: We have some scenarios for diameter load testing where TPS requirements are very high, 30K or 40K TPS. In the telco area, this is for simulating mobile usage. However, diameter load testing can be… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
15,009
Comparisons
12,504
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
483
Rating
7.6
13th
Views
1,791
Comparisons
1,019
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
597
Rating
5.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
JMeter
Learn
Apache
Radview
Video Not Available
Overview

Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.

WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.

Offer
Learn more about Apache JMeter
Learn more about RadView WebLOAD
Sample Customers
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Computer Software Company20%
University7%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm5%
Media Company4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm57%
Healthcare Company29%
University14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm12%
Educational Organization10%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise53%
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Large Enterprise90%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache JMeter is ranked 2nd in Performance Testing Tools with 15 reviews while RadView WebLOAD is ranked 13th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while RadView WebLOAD is rated 5.6. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Good performance and easy to configure but could use better UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code ". Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, LoadUI Pro and Silk Test, whereas RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, BlazeMeter and Visual Studio Test Professional. See our Apache JMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.