Compare Apache JMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD

Apache JMeter is ranked 2nd in Performance Testing Tools with 10 reviews while RadView WebLOAD is ranked 12th in Performance Testing Tools with 1 review. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while RadView WebLOAD is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Good reports and analysis capabilities with a quick initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code ". Apache JMeter is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Postman and BlazeMeter, whereas RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Neotys NeoLoad.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache JMeter Logo
11,579 views|9,994 comparisons
RadView WebLOAD Logo
1,617 views|944 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use RadView WebLOAD? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Broadcom and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: February 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
When there's a high number of TPS I can achieve more transactions per seconds given the hyper-limitations.The most valuable features are the integration with Jenkins and the reporting.The reports and analysis tools are very good. They are the solution's most valuable features.The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good.JMeter is easy to use for a user who doesn't have too much knowledge of programming or certain languages.The most valuable feature for us is the available information on the forums and to be able to discuss and get answers from the people that are involved in using this tool.The ease of use is the solution's most valuable feature. Also, the ability to easily create test cases is also very good. It's easy to just ramp up on the solution.API testing, Database Testing, and MQ testing can be done with ease.

Read more »

The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting.

Read more »

Cons
JMeter output reports can be difficult to understand without training.The interface could be made more user-friendly.It's not easy to get the data from one place or to do customizations.Automation is difficult in JMeter.Considering the kinds of tests we are performing here, where we launch several tests at the same time as a batch request, JMeter is not the best tool for the job. Those kinds of things could be done easily with other tools, like T6.There is some work to be done with the integration.In future releases, it would be helpful if there was an integration with ALM Octane.The tool should be made a bit more robust, and better support should be made available.

Read more »

Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
This is an open-source product.This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.I switched to Apache because it is free. Other tools are much too expensive and can cost up to $50,000 a year if you are looking at commercial options.Free

Read more »

We purchased a license for two years.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
11,579
Comparisons
9,994
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
398
Avg. Rating
8.2
12th
Views
1,617
Comparisons
944
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
543
Avg. Rating
6.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Also Known As
JMeter
Learn
Apache
Radview
Video Not Available
Overview

Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.

WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.

Offer
Learn more about Apache JMeter
Learn more about RadView WebLOAD
Sample Customers
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Software R&D Company27%
Hospitality Company9%
Healthcare Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company49%
Comms Service Provider13%
Retailer5%
Financial Services Firm4%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Broadcom and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: February 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.