RadView WebLOAD OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

RadView WebLOAD is the #12 ranked solution in our list of top Load Testing Tools. It is most often compared to Apache JMeter: RadView WebLOAD vs Apache JMeter

What is RadView WebLOAD?

WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.

Buyer's Guide

Download the Performance Testing Tools Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: September 2021

RadView WebLOAD Customers

GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.

Pricing Advice

What users are saying about RadView WebLOAD pricing:
  • "We purchased a license for two years."
  • "It costs $8,600 yearly and we have the Cloud, which is an additional $800. Our perpetual license is $800 and then the Cloud functionality with our 500 users is the $8,600."

Filter Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
KA
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for this solution is performance testing. Before we put an application into production, we use this solution to test it. If we think that our application will be used by one hundred users, then we test to see if it is accessible for two hundred. Essentially, it is a stress-test to see if the application can support this volume. We have an on-premises deployment.

Pros and Cons

  • "The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting."
  • "Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved."

What other advice do I have?

We do not use this solution often because it doesn't apply to our platform. I would like to know if it is possible to write the code from scratch, but this is something that I have not been able to find out. This is very important. If it had this option then it would be a very good application. Currently, it is only record and play, which I is not too accurate . I would rate this solution a six out of ten.
TS
Test Team Lead at Medtronic, Inc.
Real User
IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process but the reporting is complicated

What is our primary use case?

We have a web application that accesses the database and so we're testing the responsiveness of both the login and functionality around accessing a patient, which is the database functionality.

Pros and Cons

  • "The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."
  • "The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."

What other advice do I have?

The reporting functionality and actually running the load tests are fairly difficult, for a brand new user that's never done any load testing, it's fairly complex. There's a steep learning curve. In the next release, I would like to have better documentation on how to use the tool. Their support is fairly responsive, so that's a good thing. I would like to have better documentation so that I don't have to go to support in order to get the help that I need. It'd be nice if we had documentation that would allow me to do it myself. I would rate it a five out of ten.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Performance Testing Tools Report and find out what your peers are saying about Radview, Apache, Micro Focus, and more!