We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and SnapLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The prebuilt connectors available for SAP are really useful."
"If there's something that isn't possible, you can write some code and call that code from a Logic App."
"Easy to use and is able to integrate with other Azure-based environments."
"The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services."
"It's easy to use, and it's stable."
"The product's most valuable feature is scalability."
"We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable."
"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."
"It is a scalable solution."
"SnapLogic is a great platform for establishing integrations among various systems or patterns by using any kind of interface. If something is not supported by predefined snaps – snaps are connectors in SnapLogic – you can create them (custom snaps) or write a script."
"The solutions ability to connect "snaps" or components to the graphic user interface is very intuitive, prevents errors, and makes implementations easy."
"It's more developer-friendly, and development can be done at a faster phase."
"The solution is easy to implement and easy to use. It's basically just drag and drop."
"They are very good at building out new aspects according to customer requirements."
"By using snaps instead of functions in code, you can see the building blocks of the integration visually. This helps a lot."
"SnapLogic is more user-friendly than Boomi in terms of debugging. You can move the mouse to a place, and it will record and show the data easily."
"It would be helpful if the vendor could provide more data connectors."
"The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services."
"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."
"The visual tool that is used to build integration is quite old."
"Standard documents are fine, but in certain situations, when facing specific errors or issues, partners or consumers expect customized solutions rather than just links to existing documents."
"An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features."
"The pricing could be improved."
"We'd like there to be more ways for users to get more comfortable and have more experience with the solution to make it easier to use."
"I am looking for more scheduling options. When it comes to scheduling, there are different tools in the market."
"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."
"SnapLogic should have some inbuilt protocol mechanism in order to speed up."
"We'd like zero downtime in the future."
"Connecting to data behind enterprise firewalls has been tricky."
"The support is the most important improvement they could make."
"It needs some more snaps. I would like to see some of the features be changed in some of the snaps."
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 28 reviews while SnapLogic is ranked 6th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 20 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while SnapLogic is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SnapLogic writes "Easy to set up, easy to use, and is low-code". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi AtomSphere Integration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and MuleSoft Composer, whereas SnapLogic is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Fivetran. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. SnapLogic report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
